Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32873952›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2020

The Ph paradigm in cancer.

Tomas Koltai

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Responsive nanomaterials in biomedicine, patent path and prospect analysis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Mesoporous FeRSC advances · 2024
    Article
  14. New Horizons in HyperpolarizedMolecular imaging and biology · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Exploring monocarboxylate transporter inhibition for cancer treatment.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. A pilot study to improve pain phenotyping in head and neck cancer patients.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tomas KoltaiObra Social de la Alimentacion, Maipu 712/piso 7B, 1006, Buenos Aires, Argentina. tkoltai@hotmail.com.
Asociación por los Derechos Civiles · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malignant tissues show a peculiar feature regarding pH: while normal tissues have a higher extracellular pH than intracellular pH, in cancer is exactly the opposite. This phenomenon is called the inversion of the pH gradient and is now considered a hallmark of malignancy. For some time, this inverted pH gradient was believed to be a secondary effect of cancer. Now, it is becoming clear that pH inversion is not an innocent consequence, but a key player in the etiopathogenesis of cancer. Therefore, addressing this issue as part of an integral treatment of neoplasia should be a necessary step for improving cancer patients' outcomes. However, the knowledge acquired in this regard through basic research has not reached bedside treatments. The most striking fact is that there are repurposed drugs and nutraceuticals with low or no toxicity that can modify the pH gradient inversion. However, these drugs have not even been tested in cancer treatment.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsHumansHydrogen-Ion Concentration

Identifiers

PMID32873952
OpenAlexW3082050780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.