Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32873831›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Is the risk of second primary malignancy increased in multiple myeloma in the novel therapy era? A population-based, retrospective cohort study in Taiwan.

Yanfang Liu, Hsin-An Hou, Hong Qiu, Chao-Hsiun Tang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Yanfang Liu *Global Epidemiology, Janssen Research & Development, 2 Science Park Drive, Sinagapore, 118222, Singapore.
Hsin-An Hou *Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, No 7, ZhongShan South Road, Zhongzheng District, Taipei, 100, Taiwan.
Hong QiuGlobal Epidemiology, Janssen Research & Development, 1125 Trenton-Harbourton Road, Titusville, NJ, 08560, USA.
Chao-Hsiun TangSchool of Health Care Administration, College of Management, Taipei Medical University, No.172-1 Keelung Road, Section 2, Taipei, 106, Taiwan. chtang@tmu.edu.tw.
Janssen (United States) · USNational Taiwan University Hospital · TWSingapore Science Park · SGTaipei Medical University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Longer survival in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) after treatment with novel agents (NA) such as thalidomide, bortezomib, and lenalidomide may be associated with increased risks of developing second primary malignancies (SPM). Few data describe the risk of SPM in patients with MM in Asia. This population-based retrospective cohort study assessed the risk of SPM in MM using the Taiwan National Cancer Registry and National Health Insurance Research databases from 2000 to 2014. Among 4,327 patients with newly diagnosed MM initiated with either novel agents alone (NA), chemotherapy combined with novel agents (CCNA), or chemotherapy alone (CA), the cumulative incidence of SPM overall was 1.33% at year 3. The SPM incidence per 100 person-years (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 0.914 (0.745-1.123) overall, 0.762 (0.609-1.766) for solid tumours, and 0.149 (0.090-0.247) for haematological malignancies. We compared risks of SPM using a cause-specific Cox regression model considering death as a competing risk for developing SPM. After controlling for age, gender, Charlson Co-morbidity Index, and time-period, the risk of developing any SPM or any haematological malignancy was significantly reduced in patients initiated on NA (2010-2014 period) compared to chemotherapy alone (adjusted hazard ratio 0.24, 95% CI 0.07-0.85, and 0.10, 95% CI 0.02-0.62, respectively). Contemporary treatment regiments using NA (mainly bortezomib) were associated with a lower risk for a SPM in comparison with CA.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBortezomibFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHematologic NeoplasmsHumansIncidenceLenalidomideMaleMiddle AgedMultiple MyelomaNeoplasms, Second PrimaryRegistriesAntineoplastic AgentsBortezomibLenalidomideThalidomide

Identifiers

PMID32873831
PMCPMC7463238
OpenAlexW3081559853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.