Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32873769›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2020

A Novel Risk Model Based on Autophagy Pathway Related Genes for Survival Prediction in Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Fan Zhang, Suzhen Xie, Zhenyu Zhang, Huanhuan Zhao, Zijun Zhao, Haiying Sun, Jiao Zheng

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A novel autophagy-related lncRNA survival model for lung adenocarcinoma.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fan ZhangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (mainland).
Suzhen XieDepartment of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (mainland).
Zhenyu ZhangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (mainland).
Huanhuan ZhaoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (mainland).
Zijun ZhaoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (mainland).
Haiying SunDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China (mainland).
Jiao ZhengDepartment of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (mainland).
Guangdong Province Women and Children Hospital · CNHuazhong University of Science and Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Autophagy has a principal role in mediating tumor cell metabolism. However, the role of autophagy-pathway-related genes (APRGs) as prognostic markers remains obscure in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). More potential prognostic biomarkers are needed to deepen our understanding to explore the prognostic role of APRGs in LUAD. MATERIAL AND METHODS We used The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database to identify differentially expressed APRGs. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to identify prognostic APRGs, and then a risk model was constructed. The efficacy of the risk model was confirmed using a testing group. Lastly, we explored mutational signatures of prognostic of APRGs. T-tests were used to analyze all the expression patterns of genes by SPSS 19.0. RESULTS Using TCGA database, 5 differently expressed APRGs were identified in LUAD patients, and functional enrichment analyze of the genes that were closely associated with the survival status in LUAD patients. Cox proportional hazard regression was facilitated to identify 9 APRGs (CCR2, LAMP1, RELA, ATG12, ATG9A, NCKAP1, ATG10, DNAJB9, and MBTPS2). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses further identified 5 key prognostic APRGs (CCR2, LAMP1, RELA, ATG12, and MBTPS2) that were closely related to the survival status in LUAD. Then the prognostic scores based on the 5 genes as independent prognostic indicators were constructed for overall survival (OS) of LUAD patients; area under the curve (AUC) values >0.70 (all P<0.05). The efficacy of prognostic scores was confirmed by data from the testing group and showed significant differences between the low-risk and the high-risk groups for OS (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS The risk model based on the construction of 5 APRGs can predict the prognosis of patients with LUAD, which may potentially predict prognostic signatures for LUAD.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticAdenocarcinomaAutophagyAutophagy-Related ProteinsDatabases, GeneticFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedMutationPrognosisSurvival AnalysisAutophagy-Related Proteins

Identifiers

PMID32873769
PMCPMC7486793
OpenAlexW3039271181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.