Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32873604›Full record

ArticleInjury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention2021

Facilitators, barriers and lessons learnt from the first state-wide naloxone distribution conducted in West Virginia.

Toni Marie Rudisill, Alexandria J Ashraf, Herbert I Linn, Sheena Sayres, James E Jeffries, Kelly K Gurka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Toni Marie RudisillDepartment of Epidemiology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA trudisill@hsc.wvu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2019-4274
Alexandria J AshrafSchool of Public Health, Health Research Center, Robert C Byrd Health Science Center, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
Herbert I LinnSchool of Public Health, Health Research Center, Robert C Byrd Health Science Center, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
Sheena SayresBehavioral Medicine and Psychiatry, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
James E JeffriesWest Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources, Bureau for Public Health, Office of Maternal, Child and Family Health, Charleston, West Virginia, USA.
Kelly K GurkaDepartment of Epidemiology, College of Public Health and Health Professions and College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2779-3234

Funding

West Virginia IDEA-CTRU54GM104942 · NIGMS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI Reagan Curtis · 2012 to 2026
$81.0M
West Virginia University Injury Control Research CenterR49CE002109 · CE · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI BOSSARTE, ROBERT M · 2012 to 2018
$5.7M
NCIPC CDC HHS R49 CE002109NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOverdose education and naloxone distribution programmes are known to reduce opioid-related deaths. A state-wide naloxone distribution effort of 8250 rescue kits was undertaken by government, community and university partners in West Virginia in 2016-2017. The purpose of this study was to discern the barriers, facilitators and lesson learnt from implementing this endeavour in a rural state with the highest opioid overdose fatality rate in the US.

methodsStructured interviews (n=26) were conducted among both internal and external stakeholders. Those who participated were >18 years of age and were the lead representative from agencies that either received naloxone (ie, external stakeholders) or helped implement the distribution (ie, internal stakeholders). The interviews followed standardised scripts and lasted approximately 40 min. Sessions were audio-recorded and transcribed. Qualitative content analysis was performed by two researchers to determine themes surrounding facilitators or barriers to programme implementation.

resultsThe primary facilitators reported by stakeholders included collaborative partnerships, ease of participating in the programme, being established in prevention efforts, demand for naloxone and the need for personal protection from overdose. The primary barriers identified by stakeholders included bureaucracy/policy/procedures of their organisation or agency, stigma, logistical or planning issues, problems with reporting, lack of communication post distribution and sustainability. Numerous lessons were learnt.

conclusionsBased on the implementation of the programme in 87 organisations, including law enforcement and fire departments, the impact of facilitators outweighed that of barriers. These findings may inform others planning to conduct a similar, large-scale project.

Indexed as

Drug OverdoseNaloxoneAnalgesics, OpioidHumansLaw EnforcementWest VirginiaAnalgesics, OpioidNaloxonebehaviour changedrugseducationprogram evaluationpublic health

Identifiers

PMID32873604
PMCPMC7957827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.