Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32873368›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS2020

Cardiovascular and Metabolic Responses to Carbon Dioxide Euthanasia in Conscious and Anesthetized Rats.

Kathryn E Nichols, Kimberly L Holliday-White, Heather M Bogie, Kim M Swearingen, Megan S Fine, Jennifer Doyle, Scott R Tiesma

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Thermal Response of Laboratory Rats (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kathryn E NicholsSurgical Services, Data Sciences International, St Paul, Minnesota;, Email: knichols@datasci.com.
Kimberly L Holliday-WhiteSurgical Services, Data Sciences International, St Paul, Minnesota.
Heather M BogieSurgical Services, Data Sciences International, St Paul, Minnesota.
Kim M SwearingenSurgical Services, Data Sciences International, St Paul, Minnesota; Envigo, Denver, Pennsylvania.
Megan S FineSurgical Services, Data Sciences International, St Paul, Minnesota; Boston Scientific, St Paul, Minnesota.
Jennifer DoyleData Services, Data Sciences International, St Paul, Minnesota.
Scott R TiesmaMarketing, Data Sciences International, St Paul, Minnesota; Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Data Sciences International (United States) · USMedtronic (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Euthanasia is a necessary component in research and must be conducted humanely. Currently, regulated CO₂ exposure in conscious rats is acceptable, but data are divided on whether CO₂ alone is more distressing than anesthesia prior to CO₂. To evaluate distress in rats, we compared physiologic responses to CO₂ euthanasia with and without isoflurane preanesthesia. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were implanted with telemetry devices to measure mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and blood glucose. Animals recovered for 2 wk and were then exposed to either 5% isoflurane (

Indexed as

Rats, Sprague-DawleyAnesthetics, InhalationAnimalsArterial PressureCarbon DioxideEuthanasia, AnimalHeart RateIsofluraneMaleRatsTelemetryAnesthetics, InhalationCarbon DioxideIsoflurane

Identifiers

PMID32873368
PMCPMC7604681
OpenAlexW3081875899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.