Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32873295›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2020

A systematic scoping review of change management practices used for telemedicine service implementations.

Joanna Kho, Nicole Gillespie, Melinda Martin-Khan

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Impact of Emerging Technologies on Outpatient Care Quality: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Telehealth Implementation Response to COVID-19 in the OneFlorida+ Clinical Research Network: Perspectives of Clinicians and Health Systems Leaders.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joanna KhoUQ Business School, The University of Queensland, Colin Clark Building 39 Blair Drive, St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia. j.kho@uq.edu.au.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6465-5485
Nicole GillespieUQ Business School, The University of Queensland, Colin Clark Building 39 Blair Drive, St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6101-2123
Melinda Martin-KhanCentre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0803-6636

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council APP1061183National Health and Medical Research Council APP1116052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTelemedicine improves access to health care services enabling remote care diagnosis and treatment of patients at a distance. However, the implementation of telemedicine services often pose challenges stemming from the lack of attention to change management (CM). Health care practitioners and researchers agree that successful telemedicine services require significant organizational and practice change. Despite recognizing the importance of the "people-side" of implementation, research on what constitutes best practice CM strategies for telemedicine implementations remains fragmented, offering little cohesive insight into the specific practices involved in the change process. We conducted a systematic scoping review of the literature to examine what and how CM practices have been applied to telemedicine service implementation, spanning a variety of health care areas and countries.

methodsThree bibliographic databases (CINAHL, PubMed, and ISI Web of Science) and four specialist telehealth journals were searched. To keep the review manageable and relevant to contemporary telemedicine technologies and contexts, the search was limited to articles published from 2008 to 2019. Forty-eight articles were selected for inclusion.

resultsFrom the 48 articles, 16 CM practices were identified relating to either strategic or operational aspects of telemedicine implementations. We identify the key CM practices that are recognized in the broader CM literature as essential for successful and sustained change but are not commonly reported in telemedicine implementation studies. We draw on the CM literature to provide a comprehensive process-based, researched-informed, organizing framework to guide future telemedicine service implementations and research.

conclusionsOur findings suggest that the slow rate of adoption of telemedicine may be due to a piecemeal approach to the change process, and a lack of understanding of how to plan, manage and reinforce change when implementing telemedicine services.

Indexed as

Change ManagementDelivery of Health CareHealth ServicesHumansTelemedicineChange managementChange readinessImplementationOrganizational changeResistanceTelehealthTelemedicineVirtual care

Identifiers

PMID32873295
PMCPMC7461334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.