Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32873284›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2020

Factors underlying surrogate medical decision-making in middle eastern and east Asian women: a Q-methodology study.

Muhammad M Hammami, Areej Al Balkhi, Sophia S De Padua, Kafa Abuhdeeb

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Muhammad M HammamiClinical Studies and Empirical Ethics Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, P O Box # 3354 MBC 03, Riyadh, 11211, Saudi Arabia. muhammad@kfshrc.edu.sa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0086-5819
Areej Al BalkhiClinical Studies and Empirical Ethics Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, P O Box # 3354 MBC 03, Riyadh, 11211, Saudi Arabia.
Sophia S De PaduaClinical Studies and Empirical Ethics Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, P O Box # 3354 MBC 03, Riyadh, 11211, Saudi Arabia.
Kafa AbuhdeebClinical Studies and Empirical Ethics Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, P O Box # 3354 MBC 03, Riyadh, 11211, Saudi Arabia.
King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre · SAAlfaisal University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is not clear how lay people prioritize the various, sometimes conflicting, interests when they make surrogate medical decisions, especially in non-Western cultures. The extent such decisions are perspective-related is also not well documented.

methodsWe explored the relative importance of 28 surrogate decision-making factors to 120 Middle-Eastern (ME) and 120 East-Asian (EA) women from three perspectives, norm-perception (N), preference as patient (P), and preference as surrogate decision-maker (S). Each respondent force-ranked (one to nine) 28 opinion-items according to each perspective. Items' ranks were analyzed by averaging-analysis and Q-methodology.

resultsRespondents' mean (SD) age was 33.2 (7.9) years; all ME were Muslims, 83% of EA were Christians. "Trying everything possible to save patient," "Improving patient health," "Patient pain and suffering," and/or "What is in the best interests of patient" were the three most-important items, whereas "Effect of caring for patient on all patients in society," "Effect of caring for patient on patients with same disease," and/or "Cost to society from caring for patient" were among the three least-important items, in each ME and EA perspectives. P-perspective assigned higher mean ranks to family and surrogate's needs and burdens-related items, and lower mean rank to "Fear of loss" than S-perspective (p<0.001). ME assigned higher mean ranks to "Medical facts" and "Surrogate own wishes for patient" and lower mean rank to "Family needs" in all perspectives (p<0.001). Q-methodology identified models that were relatively patient's preference-, patient's religious/spiritual beliefs-, or emotion-dependent (all perspectives); medical facts-dependent (N- and S-perspectives), financial needs-dependent (P- and S-perspectives), and family needs-dependent (P-perspective).

conclusions1) Patient's health was more important than patient's preference to ME and EA women; society interest was least important. 2) Family and surrogate's needs/ burdens were more important, whereas fear of loss was less important to respondents as patients than as surrogate decision-makers. 3) Family needs were more important to EA than ME respondents, the opposite was true for medical facts and surrogate's wishes for patient. 4) Q-methodology models that relatively emphasized various surrogate decision-making factors overlapped the ME and EA women' three perspectives.

Indexed as

AdultAsian PeopleClinical Decision-MakingCross-Sectional StudiesFamily RelationsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedProxySurveys and QuestionnairesAnd surrogate decision-maker preferenceAveraging-analysisEast AsianMiddle easternNorm perceptionPatient preferenceQ-methodologySurrogate medical decision-making

Identifiers

PMID32873284
PMCPMC7466416
OpenAlexW3082690226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.