ArticleBMC urology2020
A urine-based Exosomal gene expression test stratifies risk of high-grade prostate Cancer in men with prior negative prostate biopsy undergoing repeat biopsy.
Article in BMC urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exosomal Liquid Biopsy in Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review of Biomarkers for Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Treatment Response.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Pooled it
- Accuracy of novel urinary biomarker tests in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- ExoDx prostate test as a predictor of outcomes of high-grade prostate cancer - an interim analysis.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2023Trial
- Microglia-derived extracellular vesicle content as a biomarker for early detection of Alzheimer's disease.Translational neurodegeneration · 2026Review
- Design and optimization of a Cu-MOF@graphene oxide nanozyme for point-of-care colorimetric determination of sarcosine and HRSC advances · 2026Article
- Extracellular vesicles as mediators of prostatic diseases: connecting function to diagnostic and therapeutic applications.Extracellular vesicles and circulating nucleic acids · 2026Review
- Review
- Roadblocks of Urinary EV Biomarkers: Moving Toward the Clinic.Journal of extracellular vesicles · 2025Review
- Personalised Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Evaluating Biomarker-based Approaches to Reduce Unnecessary Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biopsy Procedures.European urology open science · 2025Review
- Clinical Validation of MyProstateScore 2.0 Testing Using First-Catch, Non-Digital Rectal Examination Urine.The Journal of urology · 2025Article
- An Exosomal mRNA Urine Test for Detection and Risk Stratification of Human Kidney Transplant Rejection.Kidney international reports · 2025Article
- Evaluation of blood and urine based biomarkers for detection of clinically-significant prostate cancer.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2025Review
- Liquid Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Current Status and Emerging Prospects.The world journal of men's health · 2025Review
- The new advance of exosome-based liquid biopsy for cancer diagnosis.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2024Review
- Optimized workflow of EV enrichment from human plasma samples for downstream mass spectrometry analysis.Discover oncology · 2024Article
- Urinary extracellular vesicles in childhood kidney diseases.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2024Review
- Development and Validation of an 18-Gene Urine Test for High-Grade Prostate Cancer.JAMA oncology · 2024Article
- Review
- Current advances of liquid biopsies in prostate cancer: Molecular biomarkers.Molecular therapy oncolytics · 2023Review
- MyProstateScore in men considering repeat biopsy: validation of a simple testing approach.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInitial prostate biopsy often fails to identify prostate cancer resulting in patient anxiety, especially when clinical features such as prostate specific antigen (PSA) remain elevated, leading to the need for repeat biopsies. Prostate biomarker tests, such as the ExoDx™ Prostate (IntelliScore), or EPI test, have been shown to provide individualized risk assessment of clinically significant prostate cancer at initial biopsy; however, the performance in the repeat biopsy setting is not well established.
methodsAs part of a previous prospective clinical validation study evaluating the performance of the EPI test, we collected first-catch, non-DRE urine samples across 22 sites from men with at least one prior negative biopsy scheduled to undergo a repeat prostate biopsy to rule out prostate cancer. All men were 50 years or older with a PSA 2-10 ng/mL. Exosomal mRNA was extracted and expression of three genomic markers, PCA3, ERG and SPDEF was measured. The resulting EPI score was correlated with biopsy results.
results229 men with a prior negative biopsy underwent repeat biopsies. ExoDx Prostate demonstrated good performance ruling out high-grade (Grade group 2, GG2, or higher) prostate cancer (HGPCa) using the previously validated 15.6 cut point in the initial biopsy setting. The EPI test yielded an NPV of 92% independent of other clinical features and would have avoided 26% of unnecessary biopsies while missing only five patients with HGPCa (2.1%). Furthermore, the EPI test provided additional information at a cut-point of 20 and 29.6 with an NPV of 94%, potentially delaying 35 and 61% of unnecessary biopsies, respectively. AUC curves and Net Health Benefit Analyses demonstrated superior performance of ExoDx Prostate over PSA and clinical only risk calculators, i.e. ERSPC.
conclusionsThe EPI test provided good performance using the 15.6 cut-point for ruling out HGPCa / GG2 or higher in men undergoing a repeat prostate biopsy with a PSA of 2-10 ng/ml. Furthermore, the test utilizes gene expression data independent of clinical features to predict the likelihood of HGPCa / GG2 on a subsequent needle biopsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.