Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32873258›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

The physical activity at work (PAW) study protocol: a cluster randomised trial of a multicomponent short-break intervention to reduce sitting time and increase physical activity among office workers in Thailand.

Cynthia Chen, Anna Valeria Dieterich, Jemima Jia En Koh, Katika Akksilp, Eunice Huiying Tong, Nuttakarn Budtarad, Andre Matthias Müller, Thunyarata Anothaisintawee, Bee Choo Tai, Waranya Rattanavipapong and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06076915 (Usability and Feasibility Trial of an Exergame-based Occupational Health Intervention at Two Swiss Workforce Companies), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06076915 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Usability and Feasibility Trial of an Exergame-based Occupational Health Intervention at Two Swiss Workforce Companies

TypeinterventionalSponsorSwiss Federal Institute of TechnologyRan2021 to 2021Enrolled22ConditionsHealthyArmsExergame training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Cynthia ChenSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Anna Valeria DieterichSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Jemima Jia En KohSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Katika AkksilpDepartment of Health, Ministry of Public Health,Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Programme (HITAP), Ministry of Public Health, 6th Floor, 6th Building, Tiwanon Road, Nonthaburi, 11000, Thailand. katika.a@hitap.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7270-8820
Eunice Huiying TongSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Nuttakarn BudtaradDepartment of Health, Ministry of Public Health,Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Programme (HITAP), Ministry of Public Health, 6th Floor, 6th Building, Tiwanon Road, Nonthaburi, 11000, Thailand.
Andre Matthias MüllerSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Thunyarata AnothaisintaweeDepartment of Health, Ministry of Public Health,Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Programme (HITAP), Ministry of Public Health, 6th Floor, 6th Building, Tiwanon Road, Nonthaburi, 11000, Thailand.
Bee Choo TaiSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Waranya RattanavipapongDepartment of Health, Ministry of Public Health,Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Programme (HITAP), Ministry of Public Health, 6th Floor, 6th Building, Tiwanon Road, Nonthaburi, 11000, Thailand.
Wanrudee IsaranuwatchaiDepartment of Health, Ministry of Public Health,Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Programme (HITAP), Ministry of Public Health, 6th Floor, 6th Building, Tiwanon Road, Nonthaburi, 11000, Thailand.
Thomas RouyardHitotsubashi Institute for Advanced Study, Hitotsubashi University, Kunitachi, Japan.
Ryota NakamuraHitotsubashi Institute for Advanced Study, Hitotsubashi University, Kunitachi, Japan.
Falk Müller-RiemenschneiderSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Yot TeerawattananonSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
National University of Singapore · SGMinistry of Public Health · THHitotsubashi University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh levels of sedentary behaviour (SB) are associated with non-communicable diseases. In 2016, the estimated total healthcare expenditure from physical activity (PA) in Thailand added up to $190 million in international dollars. The challenge to reduce SB and increase PA among office workers is more urgent now than ever as Thailand is transforming itself from a predominantly rural country to an increasingly urban one. This study will investigate the effectiveness of a multicomponent short break intervention on the reduction of SB during office hours. METHODS/

designThis two-armed Physical Activity at Work (PAW) cluster randomised controlled trial will recruit 360 office workers from 18 offices in the Thailand's Ministry of Public Health (MOPH). Offices will be randomised to either the intervention group or the control group. The multicomponent intervention is informed by the Social Ecological Model and Behaviour Change Techniques (BCTs) and contains four components: (i) organisational, including heads of the participating divisions leading exercises, sending encouragement text messages and acknowledging efforts; (ii) social, including team movement breaks and team-based incentives; (iii) environmental, including posters to encourage exercise; and (iv) individual components including real-time PA feedback via an individual device. The main intervention component will be a short break intervention. The primary outcome of this study is the sedentary time of office workers. Secondary outcomes include time spent on PA, cardiometabolic outcomes, work productivity, musculoskeletal pain, and quality of life. The study also includes process and economic evaluations from the individual and societal perspective. DISCUSSION: The study will be the first experimental study in Thailand to investigate the effect of a short-break intervention at the workplace on SBs of office workers and health outcomes. The study will also include a cost-effectiveness analysis to inform investments on short break interventions under the Universal Healthcare Coverage in Thailand, which includes health promotion and disease prevention component.

trial registrationThe PAW study has been registered at the Thai Clinical Trials Registry (TCTR) under the study ID TCTR20200604007 . Registered 02 June 2020,.

Indexed as

ExerciseSedentary BehaviorWorkplaceAdultCost-Benefit AnalysisHealth BehaviorHealth PromotionHumansMotivationQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignThailandBehaviour change techniquesCost-effectivenessMulticomponent interventionNon-communicable diseasesPhysical activityProductivityQuality of lifeSedentary behaviour

Identifiers

PMID32873258
PMCPMC7466487
OpenAlexW3082021688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.