ReviewTissue engineering. Part B, Reviews2021
Innovative Molecular and Cellular Therapeutics in Cleft Palate Tissue Engineering.
Review in Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Investigating FTY720-NF immunomodulation of key lipid, gene, and protein mediators to enhance oral tissue regeneration.Biomaterials advances · 2026Article
- Single cell spatial transcriptomics links Wnt signaling disruption to extracellular matrix development in a cleft palate model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Options for Regenerative Treatment with Bone Grafts in Children with Anterior Lip/Palate Cleft-A Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Stem Cell-Based Regenerative Approaches for the Treatment of Cleft Lip and Palate: A Comprehensive Review.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2024Review
- Editorial: Skull and craniofacial development and regeneration.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Article
- Multimodal spatiotemporal transcriptomic resolution of embryonic palate osteogenesis.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Deficiency ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Integrated spatiotemporal transcriptomic resolution of embryonic palate osteogenesis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Evaluation of the Multiple Tissue Factors in the Cartilage of Primary and Secondary Rhinoplasty in Cleft Lip and Palate Patients.Pediatric reports · 2022Article
- Cleft Palate in Apert Syndrome.Journal of developmental biology · 2022Review
- Extracellular Matrix in Human Craniofacial Development.Journal of dental research · 2022Review
- Functional identification of a rare vascular endothelial growth factor a (Bioengineered · 2021Article
- Evidence of Stem Cell Efficacy on Developmental and Functional Alterations in Craniofacial Diseases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Stem Cells Regenerating the Craniofacial Skeleton: Current State-Of-The-Art and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Clefts of the lip and/or palate are the most prevalent orofacial birth defects occurring in about 1:700 live human births worldwide. Early postnatal surgical interventions are extensive and staged to bring about optimal growth and fusion of palatal shelves. Severe cleft defects pose a challenge to correct with surgery alone, resulting in complications and sequelae requiring life-long, multidisciplinary care. Advances made in materials science innovation, including scaffold-based delivery systems for precision tissue engineering, now offer new avenues for stimulating bone formation at the site of surgical correction for palatal clefts. In this study, we review the present scientific literature on key developmental events that can go awry in palate development and the common surgical practices and challenges faced in correcting cleft defects. How key osteoinductive pathways implicated in palatogenesis inform the design and optimization of constructs for cleft palate correction is discussed within the context of translation to humans. Finally, we highlight new osteogenic agents and innovative delivery systems with the potential to be adopted in engineering-based therapeutic approaches for the correction of palatal defects. Impact statement Tissue-engineered scaffolds supplemented with osteogenic growth factors have attractive, largely unexplored possibilities to modulate molecular signaling networks relevant to driving palatogenesis in the context of congenital anomalies (e.g., cleft palate). Constructs that address this need may obviate current use of autologous bone grafts, thereby avoiding donor-site morbidity and other regenerative challenges in patients afflicted with palatal clefts. Combinations of biomaterials and drug delivery of diverse regenerative cues and biologics are currently transforming strategies exploited by engineers, scientists, and clinicians for palatal cleft repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.