Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32873216›Full record

ReviewTissue engineering. Part B, Reviews2021

Innovative Molecular and Cellular Therapeutics in Cleft Palate Tissue Engineering.

Jeremie D Oliver, Shihai Jia, Leslie R Halpern, Emily M Graham, Emma C Turner, John S Colombo, David W Grainger, Rena N D'Souza

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Deficiency ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Cleft Palate in Apert Syndrome.Journal of developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jeremie D OliverSchool of Dentistry, University of Utah Health Sciences, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Shihai JiaSchool of Dentistry, University of Utah Health Sciences, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Leslie R HalpernSchool of Dentistry, University of Utah Health Sciences, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Emily M GrahamSchool of Medicine, University of Utah Health Sciences, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Emma C TurnerUniversity of Western Australia Dental School, Perth, Western Australia.
John S ColomboUniversity of Las Vegas at Nevada School of Dental Medicine, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.
David W GraingerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Rena N D'SouzaSchool of Dentistry, University of Utah Health Sciences, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
University of Utah · USUniversity of Western Australia · AU

Funding

New Molecules and Cures for Tooth AgenesisR01DE027255 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI JIA, SHIHAI · 2017 to 2020
$2.0M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE027255
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clefts of the lip and/or palate are the most prevalent orofacial birth defects occurring in about 1:700 live human births worldwide. Early postnatal surgical interventions are extensive and staged to bring about optimal growth and fusion of palatal shelves. Severe cleft defects pose a challenge to correct with surgery alone, resulting in complications and sequelae requiring life-long, multidisciplinary care. Advances made in materials science innovation, including scaffold-based delivery systems for precision tissue engineering, now offer new avenues for stimulating bone formation at the site of surgical correction for palatal clefts. In this study, we review the present scientific literature on key developmental events that can go awry in palate development and the common surgical practices and challenges faced in correcting cleft defects. How key osteoinductive pathways implicated in palatogenesis inform the design and optimization of constructs for cleft palate correction is discussed within the context of translation to humans. Finally, we highlight new osteogenic agents and innovative delivery systems with the potential to be adopted in engineering-based therapeutic approaches for the correction of palatal defects. Impact statement Tissue-engineered scaffolds supplemented with osteogenic growth factors have attractive, largely unexplored possibilities to modulate molecular signaling networks relevant to driving palatogenesis in the context of congenital anomalies (e.g., cleft palate). Constructs that address this need may obviate current use of autologous bone grafts, thereby avoiding donor-site morbidity and other regenerative challenges in patients afflicted with palatal clefts. Combinations of biomaterials and drug delivery of diverse regenerative cues and biologics are currently transforming strategies exploited by engineers, scientists, and clinicians for palatal cleft repair.

Indexed as

Cleft PalateHumansSignal TransductionTissue EngineeringTissue Scaffoldscleft palatecraniofacialdrug deliverypolymer scaffoldregenerative surgerytissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID32873216
PMCPMC8349724
OpenAlexW3081847944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.