Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32873212›Full record

ArticleGlobal health action2020

Noncommunicable Disease (NCD) strategic plans in low- and lower-middle income Sub-Saharan Africa: framing and policy response.

Chantelle Boudreaux, Christopher Noble, Matthew M Coates, Jason Kelley, Martin Abanda, Alexander Kintu, Amy McLaughlin, Andrew Marx, Gene Bukhman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health action, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Ghana's Adherence to PASCAR's 10-Point Action Plan towards Hypertension Control: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Chantelle BoudreauxProgram in Global NCDs and Social Change, Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9776-8523
Christopher NobleProgram in Global NCDs and Social Change, Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA, USA.
Matthew M CoatesDivision of Global Health Equity, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital , Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8474-4992
Jason KelleyNCD Synergies Project, Partners in Health , Boston, MA, USA.
Martin AbandaProgram in Global NCDs and Social Change, Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA, USA.
Alexander KintuDepartment of Global Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health , Boston, MA, USA.
Amy McLaughlinNCD Synergies Project, Partners in Health , Boston, MA, USA.
Andrew MarxProgram in Global NCDs and Social Change, Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA, USA.
Gene BukhmanProgram in Global NCDs and Social Change, Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4500-7903

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlobal efforts to address NCDs focus primarily on 4-by-4 interventions - interventions to prevent and treat four groups of conditions affecting mainly older adults (some cardiovascular disease and cancers, type 2 diabetes, chronic respiratory disease) and four associated risk factors (alcohol, tobacco, poor diets, and physical inactivity). However, the NCD burden in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is composed of a more diverse set of conditions, driven by a more complex group of risks, and impacting all segments of the population.

objectiveTo document the NCD priorities identified by NCD strategic plans, to characterize the proposed policy response, and to assess the alignment between the two.

methodsUsing a two-part conceptual framework, we undertook a descriptive study to characterize the framing and overall policy response of strategic plans from 24 low- and lower-middle-income countries across SSA.

resultsThe national situation assessments that ground strategic plans emphasize a diversity of conditions that range in terms of severity and frequency. These assessments also highlight a wide diversity of factors that shape this burden. Most include discussions of a broad range of behavioral, structural, genetic, and infectious risk factors. Plans endorse a more narrow response to this diverse burden, with a focus on primary and secondary prevention that is generally convergent with the objectives established in global policy documents.

conclusionsBroadly, we observe that plans developed by countries in SSA recognize the heterogeneity of the NCD burden in this region. However, they emphasize interventions that are consistent with global strategies focused on preventing a narrower set of cardiometabolic risk factors and their associated diseases. In comparison, relatively few countries detail plans to prevent, treat, and palliate the full scope of the needs they identify. There is a need for increased support for bottom-up planning efforts to address local priorities.

Indexed as

Health PolicyAfrica South of the SaharaCardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansMaleNoncommunicable DiseasesPovertyRisk FactorsAfricabehavioural risk factorsCancercardiovascular disease, CVDchronic respiratory disease, CRDdiabetesGlobal Action Planlow and lower-middle income countriespolicystrategic planSub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID32873212
PMCPMC7782517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.