Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32873203›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2020

Context-dependent modulation of natural approach behaviour in mice.

Nicole M Procacci, Kelsey M Allen, Gael E Robb, Rebecca Ijekah, Hudson Lynam, Jennifer L Hoy

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. PSD-95 drives binocular vision maturation critical for predation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The visuomotor transformations underlying target-directed behavior.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  10. Natural visual behavior and active sensing in the mouse.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Predation without direction selectivity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Neurocircuitry of Predatory Hunting.Neuroscience bulletin · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole M ProcacciDepartment of Biology, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, USA.
Kelsey M AllenDepartment of Biology, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, USA.
Gael E RobbDepartment of Neuroscience, University of St Thomas, St Paul, MN 55105, USA.
Rebecca IjekahDepartment of Physiology and Cell Biology, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, USA.
Hudson LynamDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, USA.
Jennifer L HoyDepartment of Biology, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, USA.
University of Nevada, Reno · USUniversity of St. Thomas - Minnesota · US

Funding

Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality CoreP20GM103650 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI WEBSTER, MICHAEL A · 2012 to 2022
$20.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103650
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Specific features of visual objects innately draw approach responses in animals, and provide natural signals of potential reward. However, visual sampling behaviours and the detection of salient, rewarding stimuli are context and behavioural state-dependent and it remains unclear how visual perception and orienting responses change with specific expectations. To start to address this question, we employed a virtual stimulus orienting paradigm based on prey capture to quantify the conditional expression of visual stimulus-evoked innate approaches in freely moving mice. We found that specific combinations of stimulus features selectively evoked innate approach or freezing responses when stimuli were unexpected. We discovered that prey capture experience, and therefore the expectation of prey in the environment, selectively modified approach frequency, as well as altered those visual features that evoked approach. Thus, we found that mice exhibit robust and selective orienting responses to parameterized visual stimuli that can be robustly and specifically modified via natural experience. This work provides critical insight into how natural appetitive behaviours are driven by both specific features of visual motion and internal states that alter stimulus salience.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorAnimalsMiceOrientationOrientation, SpatialVision, OcularVisual Perceptionapproachbehaviourcapturemicenaturalresponses

Identifiers

PMID32873203
PMCPMC7542797
OpenAlexW3082986212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.