Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32873151›Full record

ReviewOpen biology2020

Neutrophil interactions with the sexually transmitted parasite

Suhani B Bhakta, Jose A Moran, Frances Mercer

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Open biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Induction of apoptosis by hydroalcoholic and methanolic extract ofJournal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The Role of Small Extracellular Vesicles in Viral-Protozoan Symbiosis: Lessons FromFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Suhani B BhaktaDepartment of Biological Sciences, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, CA, USA.
Jose A MoranDepartment of Biological Sciences, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, CA, USA.
Frances MercerDepartment of Biological Sciences, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, CA, USA.
California State Polytechnic University · US

Funding

Determining the subcellular and molecular players in neutrophil trogocytic killing of the sexually-transmitted parasite Trichomonas vaginalisSC3GM135046 · NIGMS · CALIFORNIA STATE POLY U POMONA · PI MERCER, FRANCES · 2020 to 2023
$441k
Human Neutrophil Response to Trichomonas vaginalisF32AI122643 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI MERCER, FRANCES · 2016 to 2017
$119k
NIAID NIH HHS F32 AI122643NIGMS NIH HHS SC3 GM135046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trichomoniasis is the third most common sexually transmitted infection in humans and is caused by the protozoan parasite,

Indexed as

AnimalsApoptosisChemotaxis, LeukocyteCytotoxicity, ImmunologicDisease SusceptibilityFemaleHost-Parasite InteractionsHumansImmune EvasionNeutrophilsOpsonin ProteinsReactive Oxygen SpeciesSymbiosisTrichomonas vaginalisTrichomonas VaginitisOpsonin ProteinsReactive Oxygen SpeciesinflammationMycoplasma hominisneutrophilsexually transmitted infectionTrichomonas vaginalistrogocytosis

Identifiers

PMID32873151
PMCPMC7536067
OpenAlexW3082705576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.