Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32873121›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2020

Fully Automated Cardiac Assessment for Diagnostic and Prognostic Stratification Following Myocardial Infarction.

Andreas Schuster, Torben Lange, Sören J Backhaus, Carolin Strohmeyer, Patricia C Boom, Jonas Matz, Johannes T Kowallick, Joachim Lotz, Michael Steinmetz, Shelby Kutty and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance-derived left atrioventricular coupling index and major adverse cardiac events in patients following acute myocardial infarction.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2023
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Assessment of right ventricular size and function from cardiovascular magnetic resonance images using artificial intelligence.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Andreas SchusterDepartment of Cardiology and Pneumology University Medical Center GöttingenGeorg-August University Göttingen Germany.
Torben LangeDepartment of Cardiology and Pneumology University Medical Center GöttingenGeorg-August University Göttingen Germany.
Sören J BackhausDepartment of Cardiology and Pneumology University Medical Center GöttingenGeorg-August University Göttingen Germany.
Carolin StrohmeyerDepartment of Cardiology and Pneumology University Medical Center GöttingenGeorg-August University Göttingen Germany.
Patricia C BoomDepartment of Cardiology and Pneumology University Medical Center GöttingenGeorg-August University Göttingen Germany.
Jonas MatzDepartment of Cardiology and Pneumology University Medical Center GöttingenGeorg-August University Göttingen Germany.
Johannes T KowallickGerman Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), partner site Göttingen Göttingen Germany.
Joachim LotzGerman Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), partner site Göttingen Göttingen Germany.
Michael SteinmetzGerman Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), partner site Göttingen Göttingen Germany.
Shelby KuttyHelen B. Taussig Heart Center The Johns Hopkins Hospital and School of Medicine Baltimore MD.
Boris BigalkeDepartment of Cardiology Charité Campus Benjamin FranklinUniversity Medical Center Berlin Berlin Germany.
Matthias GutberletInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig Germany.
Suzanne de Waha-ThieleMedical Clinic II (Cardiology/Angiology/Intensive Care Medicine) University Heart Center LübeckUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Lübeck Germany.
Steffen DeschDepartment of Internal Medicine/Cardiology and Leipzig Heart Institute Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig Germany.
Gerd HasenfußDepartment of Cardiology and Pneumology University Medical Center GöttingenGeorg-August University Göttingen Germany.
Holger ThieleDepartment of Internal Medicine/Cardiology and Leipzig Heart Institute Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig Germany.
Thomas StiermaierMedical Clinic II (Cardiology/Angiology/Intensive Care Medicine) University Heart Center LübeckUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Lübeck Germany.
Ingo EitelMedical Clinic II (Cardiology/Angiology/Intensive Care Medicine) University Heart Center LübeckUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Lübeck Germany.
Universitätsmedizin Göttingen · DELeipzig Heart Institute · DEUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging is considered the reference methodology for cardiac morphology and function but requires manual postprocessing. Whether novel artificial intelligence-based automated analyses deliver similar information for risk stratification is unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate feasibility and prognostic implications of artificial intelligence-based, commercially available software analyses. Methods and Results Cardiovascular magnetic resonance data (n=1017 patients) from 2 myocardial infarction multicenter trials were included. Analyses of biventricular parameters including ejection fraction (EF) were manually and automatically assessed using conventional and artificial intelligence-based software. Obtained parameters entered regression analyses for prediction of major adverse cardiac events, defined as death, reinfarction, or congestive heart failure, within 1 year after the acute event. Both manual and uncorrected automated volumetric assessments showed similar impact on outcome in univariate analyses (left ventricular EF, manual: hazard ratio [HR], 0.93 [95% CI 0.91-0.95];

Indexed as

AgedArtificial IntelligenceAutomationFeasibility StudiesFemaleHeartHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionMyocardiumPrognosisRisk AssessmentRisk Factorsartificial intelligenceautomated postprocessingcardiac magnetic resonance imagingdeep learning softwarerisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID32873121
PMCPMC7726968
OpenAlexW3081989896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.