Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32873089›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group2020

Prediction of pelvic tumour coverage by magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (MRgHIFU) from referral imaging.

Ngo Fung Daniel Lam, Ian Rivens, Sharon L Giles, Emma Harris, Nandita M deSouza, Gail Ter Haar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ngo Fung Daniel LamJoint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8575-7162
Ian RivensJoint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5316-8884
Sharon L GilesThe CRUK Cancer Imaging Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8528-3745
Emma HarrisJoint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8297-0382
Nandita M deSouzaThe CRUK Cancer Imaging Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4232-476X
Gail Ter HaarJoint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8909-0775
Institute of Cancer Research · GBRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16464Cancer Research UK 19727Cancer Research UK 23557Cancer Research UK C1060/A10334Cancer Research UK C1060/A16464Department of Health PB-PG-0815-20001Medical Research CouncilPancreatic Cancer UK 2018RIF_29
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient suitability for magnetic resonance-guided high intensity focused ultrasound (MRgHIFU) ablation of pelvic tumors is initially evaluated clinically for treatment feasibility using referral images, acquired using standard supine diagnostic imaging, followed by MR screening of potential patients lying on the MRgHIFU couch in a 'best-guess' treatment position. Existing evaluation methods result in ≥40% of referred patients being screened out because of tumor non-targetability. We hypothesize that this process could be improved by development of a novel algorithm for predicting tumor coverage from referral imaging.

methodsThe algorithm was developed from volunteer images and tested with patient data. MR images were acquired for five healthy volunteers and five patients with recurrent gynaecological cancer. Subjects were MR imaged supine and in oblique-supine-decubitus MRgHIFU treatment positions. Body outline and bones were segmented for all subjects, with organs-at-risk and tumors also segmented for patients. Supine images were aligned with treatment images to simulate a treatment dataset. Target coverage (of patient tumors and volunteer intra-pelvic soft tissue), i.e. the volume reachable by the MRgHIFU focus, was quantified. Target coverage predicted from supine imaging was compared to that from treatment imaging.

resultsMean (±standard deviation) absolute difference between supine-predicted and treatment-predicted coverage for 5 volunteers was 9 ± 6% (range: 2-22%) and for 4 patients, was 12 ± 7% (range: 4-21%), excluding a patient with poor acoustic coupling (coverage difference was 53%).

conclusionPrediction of MRgHIFU target coverage from referral imaging appears feasible, facilitating further development of automated evaluation of patient suitability for MRgHIFU.

Indexed as

High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound AblationPelvic NeoplasmsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalReferral and Consultationhigh intensity focused ultrasoundhuman body deformationmagnetic resonance imaging guidancepelvisreferral imagingTreatment planning

Identifiers

PMID32873089
PMCPMC8352374
OpenAlexW3080487376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.