ArticleThe Review of scientific instruments2020
Calibration of T-shaped atomic force microscope cantilevers using the thermal noise method.
Article in The Review of scientific instruments, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The tip-sample interaction force measurements in atomic force microscopy (AFM) provide information about materials' properties with nanoscale resolution. The T-shaped cantilevers used in Torsional-Harmonic AFM allow measuring the rapidly changing tip-sample interaction forces using the torsional (twisting) deflections of the cantilever due to the off-axis placement of the sharp tip. However, it has been difficult to calibrate these cantilevers using the commonly used thermal noise-based calibration method as the mechanical coupling between flexural and torsional deflections makes it challenging to determine the deflection sensitivities from force-distance curves. Here, we present thermal noise-based calibration of these T-shaped AFM cantilevers by simultaneously analyzing flexural and torsional thermal noise spectra, along with deflection signals during a force-distance curve measurement. The calibration steps remain identical to the conventional thermal noise method, but a computer performs additional calculations to account for mode coupling. We demonstrate the robustness of the calibration method by determining the sensitivity of calibration results to the laser spot position on the cantilever, to the orientation of the cantilever in the cantilever holder, and by repeated measurements. We validated the quantitative force measurements against the known unfolding force of a protein, the I91 domain of titin, which resulted in consistent unfolding force values among six independently calibrated cantilevers.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.