ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Facial Muscle Activity Recognition with Reconfigurable Differential Stethoscope-Microphones.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many human activities and states are related to the facial muscles' actions: from the expression of emotions, stress, and non-verbal communication through health-related actions, such as coughing and sneezing to nutrition and drinking. In this work, we describe, in detail, the design and evaluation of a wearable system for facial muscle activity monitoring based on a re-configurable differential array of stethoscope-microphones. In our system, six stethoscopes are placed at locations that could easily be integrated into the frame of smart glasses. The paper describes the detailed hardware design and selection and adaptation of appropriate signal processing and machine learning methods. For the evaluation, we asked eight participants to imitate a set of facial actions, such as expressions of happiness, anger, surprise, sadness, upset, and disgust, and gestures, like kissing, winkling, sticking the tongue out, and taking a pill. An evaluation of a complete data set of 2640 events with 66% training and a 33% testing rate has been performed. Although we encountered high variability of the volunteers' expressions, our approach shows a recall = 55%, precision = 56%, and f1-score of 54% for the user-independent scenario(9% chance-level). On a user-dependent basis, our worst result has an f1-score = 60% and best result with f1-score = 89%. Having a recall ≥60% for expressions like happiness, anger, kissing, sticking the tongue out, and neutral(Null-class).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.