Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32872592›Full record

ArticleCells2020

Establishment and Evaluation of an In Vitro System for Biophysical Stimulation of Human Osteoblasts.

Martin Stephan, Julius Zimmermann, Annett Klinder, Franziska Sahm, Ursula van Rienen, Peer W Kämmerer, Rainer Bader, Anika Jonitz-Heincke

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cells, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Electronic Bone Growth Stimulators for Augmentation of Osteogenesis inFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  10. Anodic TiONanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Martin StephanBiomechanics and Implant Technology Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopedics, Rostock University Medical Centre, 18057 Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1049-7335
Julius ZimmermannInstitute of General Electrical Engineering, University of Rostock, 18059 Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1486-0426
Annett KlinderBiomechanics and Implant Technology Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopedics, Rostock University Medical Centre, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Franziska SahmBiomechanics and Implant Technology Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopedics, Rostock University Medical Centre, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Ursula van RienenInstitute of General Electrical Engineering, University of Rostock, 18059 Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1042-2058
Peer W KämmererDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Centre Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1671-3764
Rainer BaderBiomechanics and Implant Technology Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopedics, Rostock University Medical Centre, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Anika Jonitz-HeinckeBiomechanics and Implant Technology Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopedics, Rostock University Medical Centre, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
University of Rostock · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While several studies investigated the effects of mechanical or electrical stimulation on osseointegration and bone fracture healing, little is known about the molecular and cellular impact of combined biophysical stimulation on peri-implant osseointegration. Therefore, we established an in vitro system, capable of applying shear stress and electric fields simultaneously. Capacitively coupled electric fields were used for electrical stimulation, while roughened Ti6Al4V bodies conducted harmonically oscillating micromotions on collagen scaffolds seeded with human osteoblasts. Different variations of single and combined stimulation were applied for three days, while samples loaded with Ti6Al4V bodies and untreated samples served as control. Metabolic activity, expression of osteogenic markers and bone remodeling markers were investigated. While combined stimulation showed no substantial benefit compared to sole mechanical stimulation, we observed that 25 µm micromotions applied by roughened Ti6Al4V bodies led to a significant increase in gene expression of osteocalcin and tissue inhibitor of metalloprotease 1. Additionally, we found an increase in metabolic activity and expression of bone remodeling markers with reduced procollagen type 1 synthesis after 100 mV

Indexed as

Biophysical PhenomenaCell DifferentiationHumansIn Vitro TechniquesOsteoblastsbiophysical stimulationcapacitively coupled electric fieldelectrical stimulationimplantsmicromotionsosseointegrationosteoblasts

Identifiers

PMID32872592
PMCPMC7564340
OpenAlexW3081916513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.