Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32872560›Full record

ReviewMembranes2020

The Best-Practice Organism for Single-Species Studies of Antimicrobial Efficacy against Biofilms Is

Anna M Curtin, Matthew C Thibodeau, Heather L Buckley

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Membranes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anna M CurtinGreen Safe Water Lab, Civil Engineering Department, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada.
Matthew C ThibodeauGreen Safe Water Lab, Civil Engineering Department, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada.
Heather L BuckleyGreen Safe Water Lab, Civil Engineering Department, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada.
University of Victoria · CA

Funding

British Columbia Knowledge Development Fund -Canada Foundation for Innovation JELFEcoCanada SWILPIESVic Clean Energy Systems Accelerator Program -Mitacs RTANatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada DiscoveryNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada USRAUN Association of Canada Green SpacesW.E. Cowie Faculty Innovation Award -
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As potable water scarcity increases across the globe; it is imperative to identify energy and cost-effective processes for producing drinking-water from non-traditional sources. One established method is desalination of brackish and seawater via reverse osmosis (RO). However, the buildup of microorganisms at the water-membrane interface, known as biofouling, clogs RO membranes over time, increasing energy requirements and cost. To investigate biofouling mitigation methods, studies tend to focus on single-species biofilms; choice of organism is crucial to producing useful results. To determine a best-practice organism for studying antimicrobial treatment of biofilms, with specific interest in biofouling of RO membranes, we answered the following two questions, each via its own semi-systematic review: 1. Which organisms are commonly used to test antimicrobial efficacy against biofilms on RO membranes? 2. Which organisms are commonly identified via genetic analysis in biofilms on RO membranes? We then critically review the results of two semi-systematic reviews to identify pioneer organisms from the listed species. We focus on pioneer organisms because they initiate biofilm formation, therefore, inhibiting these organisms specifically may limit biofilm formation in the first place. Based on the analysis of the results, we recommend utilizing

Indexed as

biofoulingpreventionreverse osmosissemi-systematic reviewsingle-species

Identifiers

PMID32872560
PMCPMC7559251
OpenAlexW3081550322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.