Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32872551›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Cannabinoids and Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review of Animal Studies.

Kanika Singh, Negar Jamshidi, Roby Zomer, Terrence J Piva, Nitin Mantri

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Effect of Dietary Factors on Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kanika SinghThe Pangenomics Lab, School of Science, RMIT University, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia.
Negar JamshidiSchool of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia.
Roby ZomerMGC Pharmaceuticals Limited, West Perth, Western Australia 6005, Australia.
Terrence J PivaSchool of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0343-1781
Nitin MantriThe Pangenomics Lab, School of Science, RMIT University, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7621-035X
RMIT University · AU

Funding

MGC Pharmaceuticals Limited Not Applicable
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer is a major cause of death among men worldwide. Recent preclinical evidence implicates cannabinoids as powerful regulators of cell growth and differentiation, as well as potential anti-cancer agents. The aim of this review was to evaluate the effect of cannabinoids on in vivo prostate cancer models. The databases searched included PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception to August 2020. Articles reporting on the effect of cannabinoids on prostate cancer were deemed eligible. We identified six studies that were all found to be based on in vivo/xenograft animal models. Results: In PC3 and DU145 xenografts, WIN55,212-2 reduced cell proliferation in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, in LNCaP xenografts, WIN55,212-2 reduced cell proliferation by 66-69%. PM49, which is a synthetic cannabinoid quinone, was also found to result in a significant inhibition of tumor growth of up to 90% in xenograft models of LNCaP and 40% in xenograft models of PC3 cells, respectively. All studies have reported that the treatment of prostate cancers in in vivo/xenograft models with various cannabinoids decreased the size of the tumor, the outcomes of which depended on the dose and length of treatment. Within the limitation of these identified studies, cannabinoids were shown to reduce the size of prostate cancer tumors in animal models. However, further well-designed and controlled animal studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Indexed as

AnimalsBenzoxazinesCannabinoidsCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCell SurvivalDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansMaleMorpholinesNaphthalenesPC-3 CellsProstatic NeoplasmsTumor BurdenXenograft Model Antitumor Assays(3R)-((2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-((4-morpholinyl)methyl)pyrrolo-(1,2,3-de)-1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl)(1-naphthalenyl))methanoneBenzoxazinesCannabinoidsMorpholinesNaphthalenesanimal modelscancercannabinoidscannabisprostate cancerWIN55,212-2

Identifiers

PMID32872551
PMCPMC7503992
OpenAlexW3082842623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.