ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020
An Evolutionary Game Theory Study for Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling Considering Green Development Performance under the Chinese Government's Reward-Penalty Mechanism.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolutionary game and simulation analysis of construction waste recycling from the perspective of stakeholders.PloS one · 2024Article
- Evolutionary game model of construction enterprises and construction material manufacturers in the construction and demolition waste resource utilization.Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA · 2023Article
- Green supply chain decision of discarded drugs recycling: Evolutionary game and strategy simulation.PloS one · 2023Article
- A three-player game model for promoting enterprise green technology innovation from the perspective of media coverage.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Evolutionary Game Research on Green Construction Considering Consumers' Preference under Government Supervision.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Financing the capital-constrained online retailer with risk aversion: coordinating strategy analysis.Annals of operations research · 2022Article
- Impact of Recycler Information Sharing on Supply Chain Performance of Construction and Demolition Waste Resource Utilization.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Analysis of the mechanism of the impact of internet development on green economic growth: evidence from 269 prefecture cities in China.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022Article
- How Do Environmental Concerns and Governance Performance Affect Public Environmental Participation: A Case Study of Waste Sorting in Urban China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Research on the Evolutionary Game of Construction and Demolition Waste (CDW) Recycling Units' Green Behavior, Considering Remanufacturing Capability.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- The evolution of new ventures' behavioral strategies and the role played by governments in the green entrepreneurship context: an evolutionary game theory perspective.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
- Research on the Evolution of the Express Packaging Recycling Strategy, Considering Government Subsidies and Synergy Benefits.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Mechanism for Green Development Behavior and Performance of Industrial Enterprises (GDBP-IE) Using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The low efficiency of the closed-loop supply chain in construction and demolition waste (CDW) recycling has restricted the green development of China's construction industry. Additionally, the government's reward-penalty mechanism has a huge influence on green development. This study aimed to investigate the effect of green development performance (GDP) and the government's reward-penalty mechanism on the decision-making process of production and recycling units, as well as to reveal the optimal strategies under different conditions. Therefore, the strategies' evolutionary paths of production and recycling units were investigated by using evolutionary game theory. Firstly, an evolutionary game model between production units and recycling units was proposed under the government's reward-penalty mechanism. Then, the evolutionary stability strategies in different scenarios were discussed. Finally, the effects of the relevant parameters on the evolutionary paths of the game model were analyzed using numerical simulations. The main conclusions are as follows. (1) When the range of GDP changes, the evolutionary stable strategy changes accordingly. GDP plays a positive role in promoting the high-quality development of the CDW recycling supply chain, but an increase in GDP can easily lead to the simultaneous motivation of free-riding. (2) The government's reward-penalty mechanism effectively regulates the decision-making process of production and recycling units. An increase in the subsidy rate and supervision probability helps to reduce free-riding behavior. Moreover, the incentive effect of the subsidy probability on recycling units is more obvious, while the effect of the supervision probability on improving the motivation of active participation for production units is more remarkable. This paper not only provides a decision-making basis to ensure production and recycling units to make optimal strategy choices under different conditions but also provides a reference for the government to formulate a reasonable reward-penalty mechanism that is conducive to a macro-control market.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.