Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32872448›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2020

What Is the Effectiveness of Different Duration Interdisciplinary Treatment Programs in Patients with Chronic Pain? A Large-Scale Longitudinal Register Study.

Elena Tseli, Riccardo LoMartire, Linda Vixner, Wilhelmus Johannes Andreas Grooten, Björn Gerdle, Björn O Äng

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07081737 (The Future of Pain Management), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07081737 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

The Future of Pain Management: Can Person-centred and Precision AI-Based Decision Support Enhance Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation for Chronic Pain?

TypeinterventionalSponsorBjorn AngRan2026 to 2029Enrolled400ConditionsPain, Chronic, Chronic Pain, Widespread, Pain ManagementArmsInterdisciplinary treatment (IDT) + Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS), Interdisciplinary treatment (IDT)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elena TseliDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Physiotherapy, Karolinska Institutet, S-141 52 Huddinge, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8307-259X
Riccardo LoMartireDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Physiotherapy, Karolinska Institutet, S-141 52 Huddinge, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0672-8214
Linda VixnerSchool of Education, Health and Social Studies, Dalarna University, S-791 88 Falun, Sweden.
Wilhelmus Johannes Andreas GrootenDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Physiotherapy, Karolinska Institutet, S-141 52 Huddinge, Sweden.
Björn GerdlePain and Rehabilitation Centre, and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, S-581 83 Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4316-1264
Björn O ÄngDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Physiotherapy, Karolinska Institutet, S-141 52 Huddinge, Sweden.
Dalarna University · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SELinköping University · SE

Funding

AFA-Försäkring 140340Forsknings-ALF LIO-608021Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd 2017-00177Karolinska Institutet The Doctoral School in Health Care SciencesVetenskapsrådet 2015-02512
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic pain is a leading cause of disability globally. Interdisciplinary multimodal pain rehabilitation (IMPR) targets pain with a bio-psycho-social approach, often delivered as composite programs. However, evidence of optimal program duration for the rehabilitation to succeed remains scarce. This study evaluated the effectiveness of different duration IMPR-programs-using within- and between-effects analyses in a pragmatic multicenter register-based controlled design. Using the Swedish Quality Registry for Pain Rehabilitation, data from fifteen clinics specialized in chronic pain rehabilitation across Sweden were retrieved. Participants were patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain who had taken part in short (4-9 weeks;

Indexed as

multidisciplinary pain managementoutcome measuresphysical and mental functioningpractice-based evidenceregistry study

Identifiers

PMID32872448
PMCPMC7564573
OpenAlexW3081657034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.