Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32872386›Full record

ReviewGenes2020

Challenges in Human Skin Microbial Profiling for Forensic Science: A Review.

Ana Neckovic, Roland A H van Oorschot, Bianca Szkuta, Annalisa Durdle

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Advances in biosensors for bacterial detection and identification.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Developments in forensic DNA analysis.Emerging topics in life sciences · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ana NeckovicSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong 3220, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0002-637X
Roland A H van OorschotOffice of the Chief Forensic Scientist, Victoria Police Forensic Services Centre, Macleod 3085, Australia.
Bianca SzkutaSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong 3220, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2272-5355
Annalisa DurdleSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong 3220, Australia.
Deakin University · AUVictoria Police · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human microbiome is comprised of the microbes that live on and within an individual, as well as immediately surrounding them. Microbial profiling may have forensic utility in the identification or association of individuals with criminal activities, using microbial signatures derived from a personal microbiome. This review highlights some important aspects of recent studies, many of which have revealed issues involving the effect of contamination of microbial samples from both technical and environmental sources and their impacts on microbiome research and the potential forensic applications of microbial profiling. It is imperative that these challenges be discussed and evaluated within a forensic context to better understand the future directions and potential applications of microbial profiling for human identification. It is necessary that the limitations identified be resolved prior to the adoption of microbial profiling, or, at a minimum, acknowledged by those applying this new approach.

Indexed as

Bacterial Physiological PhenomenaForensic GeneticsForensic SciencesMicrobiotaBacteriaHumansSequence Analysis, DNASkinforensic limitationsforensic sciencehuman microbiomemicrobial profilingmicrobial transfer

Identifiers

PMID32872386
PMCPMC7564248
OpenAlexW3082641921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.