Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32872274›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Spatial Distribution of Noise Reduction in Four Iterative Reconstruction Algorithms in CT-A Technical Evaluation.

Anette Guleng, Kirsten Bolstad, Ingvild Dalehaug, Silje Flatabø, Daniel Aadnevik, Helge E S Pettersen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anette GulengDepartment of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, 5021 Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-8265-5662
Kirsten BolstadDepartment of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, 5021 Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-6306-9705
Ingvild DalehaugDepartment of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, 5021 Bergen, Norway.
Silje FlatabøDepartment of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, 5021 Bergen, Norway.
Daniel AadnevikDepartment of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, 5021 Bergen, Norway.
Helge E S PettersenDepartment of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, 5021 Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-4879-771X
Haukeland University Hospital · NOOslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

Trond Mohn Foundation BFS2017TMT07
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Iterative reconstruction (IR) is a computed tomgraphy (CT) reconstruction algorithm aiming at improving image quality by reducing noise in the image. During this process, IR also changes the noise properties in the images. To assess how IR algorithms from four vendors affect the noise properties in CT images, an anthropomorphic phantom was scanned and images reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP), and a medium and high level of IR. Each image acquisition was performed 30 times at the same slice position, to create noise maps showing the inter-image pixel standard deviation through the 30 images. We observed that IR changed the noise properties in the CT images by reducing noise more in homogeneous areas than at anatomical edges between structures of different densities. This difference increased with increasing IR level, and with increasing difference in density between two adjacent structures. Each vendor's IR algorithm showed slightly different noise reduction properties in how much noise was reduced at different positions in the phantom. Users need to be aware of these differences when working with optimization of protocols using IR across scanners from different vendors.

Indexed as

anthropomorphic phantomcomputed tomographyCT vendor comparisonimage analysisinter-image standard deviationiterative reconstructionnoise

Identifiers

PMID32872274
PMCPMC7555695
OpenAlexW3081918241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.