Observational studyMedicine2020
Effectiveness of percutaneous lumbar foraminoplasty in patients with lumbar foraminal spinal stenosis accompanying redundant nerve root syndrome: A retrospective observational study.
Observational study in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- An Evaluation of Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis Radiologic Grading Systems: A Systematic Review.Spine surgery and related research · 2026Review
- SPINE: High heterogeneity and no significant differences in clinical outcomes of endoscopic foraminotomy vs fusion for lumbar foraminal stenosis: a meta-analysis.EFORT open reviews · 2023Review
- Effectiveness of caudal block in patients with spinal stenosis accompanied by redundant nerve root syndrome.The Journal of international medical research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The clinical outcomes of redundant nerve root syndrome (RNRS) in patients with lumbar foraminal spinal stenosis (LFSS) are currently unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the postprocedural outcomes of RNRS in LFSS after percutaneous lumbar foraminoplasty (PLF) and identify the factors associated with RNRS by comparative analysis between patients with and without RNRS.Patients with LFSS who underwent PLF were retrospectively analyzed. RNRS is defined as the presence of thick, elongated, and tortuous structures in the cauda equine associated with lumbar spinal stenosis. Based on the sagittal or transverse magnetic resonance imaging scans obtained before the PLF, the patients were stratified into 2 groups. Comparative analysis was performed between patients with RNRS (group R) and those without RNRS (group C).From March 2016 to January 2019, 8 of the 21 (38.1%) patients undergoing PLF showed signs of RNRS on magnetic resonance imaging images. PLF showed a tendency for less therapeutic effect with respect to changes in pain intensity in group R as compared to group C, but there were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups. RNRS correlated with the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the dural sac and LFSS grade (P < .05). The CSA of the dural sac was smaller and the grade of LFSS was higher in group R than in group C.RNRS is commonly associated with lumbar spinal stenosis and could affect the treatment outcomes. Clinical outcomes in group R were not statistically different from those in group C, although group R showed slightly worse outcomes. The independent factors associated with RNRS were CSA of the dural sac and the LFSS grade.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.