ArticleMedicine2020
A multicenter randomized controlled trial to assess the efficacy of cancer green therapy in treatment of stage IIIb/IV non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Awakening antitumour immunity in the multimorbid host: a hypothesis coupling cryoablation-induced immunogenic cell death with multi-target Traditional Chinese Medicine.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Cryoablation and immune synergistic effect for lung cancer: A review.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- Image-guided percutaneous ablation for lung malignancies.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Survival in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients Treated With Sunitinib With or Without Cryoablation.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Plasmatic Levels of HSP90α at Diagnosis: A Novel Prognostic Indicator of Clinical Outcome in Advanced Lung Cancer Patients Treated With PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors Plus Chemotherapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Are Published Cancer Care Trial Protocols With Traditional Chinese Medicine Interventions Concordant With SPIRIT-TCM Extension 2018? A Scoping Review on Published Trial Protocols Between 2019 and 2022.Integrative cancer therapiesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChemotherapy is the main therapy for stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the 5-year survival rate is 6%. Cancer Green Therapy is a novel therapy in China, which refers to cryoablation combined with traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) formula. Our previous retrospective analysis showed that patients with NSCLC had longer survival time and better quality of life after receiving cryoablation combined with TCM formula, compared with patients who received chemotherapy alone.
methodsThis study is a multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical study. The experiment will be carried out in 6 hospitals at the same time, and a total of 450 cases of participants will be randomly assigned to the experimental group and the control group (n = 225). The experimental group will be given cryoablation and 28-days TCM formula, and the control group will be given 4 cycles chemotherapy. After 30 months of follow-up, the efficacy and safety of cryoablation combines with TCM formula in patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC will be observed. The primary outcome is overall survival. The secondary outcomes include progression-free survival, objective response rate, and quality of life. We will also conduct a safety evaluation of the treatment at the end of the trial. DISCUSSION: This multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical study not only provides data on the efficacy and safety of cryoablation combined with TCM formula, but also provides a novel treatment strategy for clinicians and advanced NSCLC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.