Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32871861›Full record

ArticleMedicine2020

Worse prognosis in young patients with locally advanced rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: A comparative study.

Yiyi Zhang, Ye Wang, Xing Liu, Bin Chen, Jinfu Zhuang, Shoufeng Li, Yuanfeng Yang, Yibin Su, Guoxian Guan

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Delphi Initiative for Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer (DIRECt) International Management Guidelines.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2023
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yiyi ZhangDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University.
Ye WangDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou.
Xing LiuDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University.
Bin ChenDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou.
Jinfu ZhuangDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University.
Shoufeng LiDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University.
Yuanfeng YangDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou.
Yibin SuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China.
Guoxian GuanDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University.ORCID 0000-0001-9883-3139

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To determine the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) between young and old patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) in terms of tumor response and survival outcome.LARC patients undergoing NCRT and radical surgery from 2011 to 2015 were included and divided into: young (aged ≤50 years) and old group (aged >50 years). Multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for local recurrence. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator analysis was performed to identify risk factors for overall survival. Predicting nomograms and time-indepent receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were performed to compare the models containing with/withour age groups.A total of 572 LARC patients were analyzed. The young group was associated with higher pathological TNM stage, poorly differentiated tumors, and higher rate of positive distal resection margin (P = .010; P = .019; P = .023 respectively). Young patients were associated with poorer 5-year disease-free survival and local recurrence rates (P = .023, P = .003 respectively). Cox regression analysis demonstrated that age ≤50 years (Hazard ratio = 2.994, P = .038) and higher pathological TNM stage (Hazard ratio = 3.261, P = .005) were significantly associated with increased risk for local recurrence. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator analysis and the time-indepent receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that including the age group were superior than that without age group.Young patients were associated with poorer disease free survival (DFS) and a higher risk for local recurrence in LARC following NCRT. The predicting model basing based on the age group had a better predictive ability. More intense adjuvant treatment could be considered to improve DFS and local control for young patients with LARC following NCRT.

Indexed as

AdultAgedChemoradiotherapyDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansMaleMargins of ExcisionMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingNomogramsPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisRectal Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID32871861
PMCPMC7458213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.