ArticleIn vivo (Athens, Greece)
Combination of 1
Article in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimizing Yttrium-90 Radioembolization Dosimetry for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Korean Perspective.Korean journal of radiology · 2025Review
- Transarterial Radioembolization (TARE) Global Practice Patterns: An International Survey by the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology Society of Europe (CIRSE).Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2024Article
- Lung Shunt Reduction for Yttrium-90 Radioembolization: ChemoembolizationIn vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimThe aim of this study was to address the feasibility of combination of 1 PATIENTS AND
methodsYttrium-90 radioembolization was performed in 53 patients with single nodular hepatocellular carcinomas larger than 5 cm. A total of 32 patients underwent radioembolization with glass microspheres from a single calibration date (single-dosing group), and 21 patients were treated with a combination of 1
resultsThe combined-dosing group tended to have a lower frequency of pain requiring analgesics without statistical significance (p=0.085). The objective response rate at 3 months in single-dosing group and combined-dosing group was 46.9% (15 out of 32) and 66.7% (14 out of 21), respectively.
conclusionThe combined 1
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.