Trial reportIn vivo (Athens, Greece)
Expansion of Human Dental Pulp Cells
Trial report in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Systematic Review of Clinical Applications and Regenerative Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Immunomodulatory Mechanism and Potential Application of Dental Pulp-Derived Stem Cells in Immune-Mediated Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Cultivation of Cryopreserved Human Dental Pulp Stem Cells-A New Approach to Maintaining Dental Pulp Tissue.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Clinical Potential of Dental Pulp Stem Cells in Pulp Regeneration: Current Endodontic Progress and Future Perspectives.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Review
- Characterization of Dental Pulp Stem Cell Populations in the Teeth of Patients With Neurofibromatosis Type 1 - Therapeutic Potential for Bone Tissue Engineering.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimTo optimize the expansion of human dental pulp cells in vitro by exploring several cryopreservation methodologies. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe intra-dental pulp tissues from healthy subjects were extracted and divided into three separate tissue segments, which were randomly divided into the three following groups; the fresh group, the 5% DMSO group, and the 10% DMSO group. In the fresh group, dental pulp cells were directly cultivated as primary cultures, whereas in the DMSO groups, the dental pulp cells were cultivated from cryopreserved pulp tissue segments one month later.
resultsThe cell yield and the time it took for the cells to grow out of the pulp tissue and attach to the culture plate varied among the three groups; the 5% DMSO group was inferior to the fresh group but superior to the 10% DMSO group (p<0.05). Moreover, no differences were found at the 1st passage amongst the three groups regarding the following aspects (p>0.05); colony formation rate and cell survival rate. Furthermore, no differences were noted at the 3
conclusionFive percent DMSO may be the most optimal condition for tissue storage to preserve stem cells in situ.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.