Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32871752›Full record

ArticleIn vivo (Athens, Greece)

Ole Jung, Milena Radenkovic, Sanja Stojanović, Caroline Lindner, Milijana Batinic, Oliver Görke, Jens Pissarek, Annica Pröhl, Stevo Najman, Mike Barbeck

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Suitability ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. In vivo (Athens, Greece)
    Article
  10. In vivo (Athens, Greece)
    Article
  11. Republication:In vivo (Athens, Greece)
    Article
  12. In vivo (Athens, Greece)
    Article
  13. Article
  14. In vivo (Athens, Greece)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ole JungClinic and Policlinic for Dermatology and Venereology, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Milena RadenkovicDepartment for Cell and Tissue Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, University of Niš, Niš, Serbia.
Sanja StojanovićDepartment for Cell and Tissue Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, University of Niš, Niš, Serbia.
Caroline LindnerBerlinAnalytix GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Milijana BatinicDepartment of Ceramic Materials, Chair of Advanced Ceramic Materials, Institute for Materials Science and Technologies, Technical University Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Oliver GörkeDepartment of Ceramic Materials, Chair of Advanced Ceramic Materials, Institute for Materials Science and Technologies, Technical University Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Jens PissarekBiotrics bioimplants GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Annica PröhlBerlinAnalytix GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Stevo Najman *Department of Biology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Niš, Niš, Serbia.
Mike Barbeck *BerlinAnalytix GmbH, Berlin, Germany mike.barbeck@berlinanalytix.com.
University of Nis · RSUniversity of Rostock · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimFor the treatment of different tissue defects such as jawbone defects, open wound defect, chronic ulcers, dura mater defects and corneal defects, different biomaterials are available. The use of collagen-based materials for these applications has been significantly increased over the past decades due to its excellent biocompatibility and degradability. However, no transparent collagen-based biomaterial is available until now. Thus, a newly developed transparent collagen membrane (TCM) based on natural derived porcine pericardium, which offers numerous application possibilities, was developed. The present study aimed to analyze the in vitro and in vivo biocompatibility using established methods. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe new TCM membrane and a commercially available collagen membrane (CM, Jason membrane, botiss biomaterials GmbH, Zossen, Germany) were tested for its in vitro cytocompatibility. Furthermore, the in vivo biocompatibility was analyzed using sham operations as control group. In vitro, cytocompatibility was tested in accordance with EN ISO 10993-5/-12 regulations and Live-Dead-stainings. In vivo, a subcutaneous implantation model in BALB/c mice was used and explants were prepared for analyses by established histological, immunohistochemical and histomorphometrical methods.

resultsIn vitro, both membranes showed promising cytocompatibility with a slightly better direct cell response in the Live-Dead staining assay for the TCM. In vivo, TCM induced a comparable inflammatory immune response after 10 and 30 days with comparable numbers of M1- and M2-macrophages as also found in the control group without biomaterial insertion.

conclusionThe newly transparent collagen membrane is fully biocompatible and is supporting safe clinical application in tissue repair and surgery.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsCollagenAnimalsGermanyMiceMice, Inbred BALB CSwineWound HealingBiocompatible MaterialsCollagenCollagen membraneinflammatory tissue responsetransparencywound healing

Identifiers

PMID32871752
PMCPMC7652521
OpenAlexW3082763554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.