ArticleIn vivo (Athens, Greece)
Article in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characterization and modeling of additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4V alloy with modified surfaces for medical applications.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- The evolution, pathogenicity and transmissibility of quadruple reassortant H1N2 swine influenza virus in China: A potential threat to public health.Virologica Sinica · 2024Article
- Preparation and Characterization of a Photo-Crosslinked Methacryloyl-Collagen Composite Film to Promote Corneal Nerve Regeneration via Surface Grafting of Taurine Molecules.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Analyses of the Cellular Interactions between the Ossification of Collagen-Based Barrier Membranes and the Underlying Bone Defects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Suitability ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Absorbable Artificial Dura Versus Nonabsorbable Artificial Dura in Decompressive Craniectomy for Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study in Two Centers.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- The Granule Size Mediates the In Vivo Foreign Body Response and the Integration Behavior of Bone Substitutes.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Novel Histomorphometrical Approach to Evaluate the Integration Pattern and Functionality of Barrier Membranes.Dentistry journal · 2021Article
- Article
- Article
- Republication:In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
- Article
- Validation of the Chick Chorioallantoic Membrane (CAM) Model for Biocompatibility Analysis of Biomaterials in the Context of the 3R-cascade: A Pilot Study.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimFor the treatment of different tissue defects such as jawbone defects, open wound defect, chronic ulcers, dura mater defects and corneal defects, different biomaterials are available. The use of collagen-based materials for these applications has been significantly increased over the past decades due to its excellent biocompatibility and degradability. However, no transparent collagen-based biomaterial is available until now. Thus, a newly developed transparent collagen membrane (TCM) based on natural derived porcine pericardium, which offers numerous application possibilities, was developed. The present study aimed to analyze the in vitro and in vivo biocompatibility using established methods. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe new TCM membrane and a commercially available collagen membrane (CM, Jason membrane, botiss biomaterials GmbH, Zossen, Germany) were tested for its in vitro cytocompatibility. Furthermore, the in vivo biocompatibility was analyzed using sham operations as control group. In vitro, cytocompatibility was tested in accordance with EN ISO 10993-5/-12 regulations and Live-Dead-stainings. In vivo, a subcutaneous implantation model in BALB/c mice was used and explants were prepared for analyses by established histological, immunohistochemical and histomorphometrical methods.
resultsIn vitro, both membranes showed promising cytocompatibility with a slightly better direct cell response in the Live-Dead staining assay for the TCM. In vivo, TCM induced a comparable inflammatory immune response after 10 and 30 days with comparable numbers of M1- and M2-macrophages as also found in the control group without biomaterial insertion.
conclusionThe newly transparent collagen membrane is fully biocompatible and is supporting safe clinical application in tissue repair and surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.