Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32871385›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2020

Response to SSRI intervention and amygdala activity during self-referential processing in major depressive disorder.

Kymberly D Young, Edward S Friedman, Amanda Collier, Susan R Berman, Joshua Feldmiller, Agnes E Haggerty, Michael E Thase, Greg J Siegle

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Role of the Amygdala in the Complex Relationship Between Sleep and Anxiety.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Heart-brain axis: Pushing the boundaries of cardiovascular molecular imaging.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Kymberly D YoungUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, 15213 PA, USA. Electronic address: youngk@pitt.edu.
Edward S FriedmanUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, 15213 PA, USA.
Amanda CollierUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, 15213 PA, USA.
Susan R BermanCarnegie Learning, Inc., Pittsburgh, 15219 PA, USA.
Joshua FeldmillerUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, 15213 PA, USA.
Agnes E HaggertyUniversity of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, 33136 FL, USA.
Michael E ThaseUniversity of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, 19104 PA, USA.
Greg J SiegleUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, 15213 PA, USA.
University of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · USCarnegie Learning, Inc. (United States)University of Miami · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are conflicting reports on the impact of antidepressants on neural reactions for positive information. We thus hypothesized that there would be clinically important individual differences in neural reactivity to positive information during SSRI therapy. We further predicted that only those who responded to SSRIs would show increased amygdala reactivity to positive information following treatment to a level similar to that seen in healthy participants. Depressed individuals (n = 17) underwent fMRI during performance of a task involving rating the self-relevance of emotionally positive and negative cue words before and after receiving 12 weeks of SSRI therapy. At post-treatment, SSRI responders (n = 11) had increased amygdala activity in response to positive stimuli, and decreased activity in response to negative stimuli, compared to non-responders (n = 6). Results suggest that normalizing amygdala responses to salient information is a correlate of SSRI efficacy. Second line interventions that modulate amygdala activity, such as fMRI neurofeedback, may be beneficial in those who do not respond to SSRI medications.

Indexed as

Major Depressive DisorderNeurofeedbackAmygdalaAntidepressive AgentsEmotionsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsAntidepressive AgentsSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsAmygdalaMajor depressive disorderRecoverySSRIs

Identifiers

PMID32871385
PMCPMC7476063
OpenAlexW3080121755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.