Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32871071›Full record

ArticleJournal of agricultural and food chemistry2020

Cellulase and Alkaline Treatment Improve Intestinal Microbial Degradation of Recalcitrant Fibers of Rapeseed Meal in Pigs.

Cheng Long, Christiane Rösch, Sonja de Vries, Henk Schols, Koen Venema

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Effects of Paper Mulberry (BioMed research international · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cheng LongFaculty of Science and Engineering, Centre for Healthy Eating & Food Innovation, Maastricht University -Campus Venlo, 5928 RC Venlo, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6603-6685
Christiane RöschLaboratory of Food Chemistry, Wageningen University & Research, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Sonja de VriesAnimal Nutrition Group, Wageningen University & Research, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Henk ScholsLaboratory of Food Chemistry, Wageningen University & Research, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5712-1554
Koen VenemaFaculty of Science and Engineering, Centre for Healthy Eating & Food Innovation, Maastricht University -Campus Venlo, 5928 RC Venlo, The Netherlands.
Wageningen University & Research · NLMaastricht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to investigate whether degradation of rapeseed meal (RSM) by a swine gut microbiota consortium was improved by modifying RSM by treatment with cellulase (CELL), two pectinases (PECT), or alkaline (ALK) compared to untreated RSM and to assess whether microbiota composition and activity changed. The predicted relative abundances of carbohydrate digestion and absorption, glycolysis, pentose phosphate pathway, and pyruvate metabolism were significantly increased upon CELL and ALK feeding, and CELL and ALK also exhibited increased total short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) production compared to CON.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAlkaliesAnimal FeedAnimalsBacteriaBiocatalysisBrassica napusCellulaseDietary FiberDigestionFatty Acids, VolatileFood HandlingIleumIntestinesSwineAlkaliesCellulaseDietary FiberFatty Acids, Volatilecarbohydrasecell wallpig gut microbiotapolysaccharidesrapeseed meal

Identifiers

PMID32871071
PMCPMC7530897
OpenAlexW3081941946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.