ArticleClinical chemistry2020
A Machine Learning Approach for the Automated Interpretation of Plasma Amino Acid Profiles.
Article in Clinical chemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Implementing Machine Learning in the Clinical Laboratory: Opportunities and Challenges.EJIFCC · 2025Article
- Are we ready to integrate advanced artificial intelligence models in clinical laboratory?Biochemia medica · 2025Review
- A machine learning model accurately identifies glycogen storage disease Ia patients based on plasma acylcarnitine profiles.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Article
- Advancing Laboratory Medicine Practice With Machine Learning: Swift yet Exact.Annals of laboratory medicine · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Sciences: A Scoping Review.British journal of biomedical science · 2025Article
- Prediction of inherited metabolic disorders using tandem mass spectrometry data with the help of artificial neural networks.Turkish journal of medical sciences · 2024Article
- Article
- Building the Model.Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine · 2023Review
- Utilizing augmented artificial intelligence for aminoacidopathies using collaborative laboratory integrated reporting- A cross-sectional study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2022Article
- Supervised machine learning in the mass spectrometry laboratory: A tutorial.Journal of mass spectrometry and advances in the clinical lab · 2022Article
- Machine Learning for the Biochemical Genetics Laboratory.Clinical chemistry · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPlasma amino acid (PAA) profiles are used in routine clinical practice for the diagnosis and monitoring of inherited disorders of amino acid metabolism, organic acidemias, and urea cycle defects. Interpretation of PAA profiles is complex and requires substantial training and expertise to perform. Given previous demonstrations of the ability of machine learning (ML) algorithms to interpret complex clinical biochemistry data, we sought to determine if ML-derived classifiers could interpret PAA profiles with high predictive performance.
methodsWe collected PAA profiling data routinely performed within a clinical biochemistry laboratory (2084 profiles) and developed decision support classifiers with several ML algorithms. We tested the generalization performance of each classifier using a nested cross-validation (CV) procedure and examined the effect of various subsampling, feature selection, and ensemble learning strategies.
resultsThe classifiers demonstrated excellent predictive performance, with the 3 ML algorithms tested producing comparable results. The best-performing ensemble binary classifier achieved a mean precision-recall (PR) AUC of 0.957 (95% CI 0.952, 0.962) and the best-performing ensemble multiclass classifier achieved a mean F4 score of 0.788 (0.773, 0.803).
conclusionsThis work builds upon previous demonstrations of the utility of ML-derived decision support tools in clinical biochemistry laboratories. Our findings suggest that, pending additional validation studies, such tools could potentially be used in routine clinical practice to streamline and aid the interpretation of PAA profiles. This would be particularly useful in laboratories with limited resources and large workloads. We provide the necessary code for other laboratories to develop their own decision support tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32870990What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.