Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32870990›Full record

ArticleClinical chemistry2020

A Machine Learning Approach for the Automated Interpretation of Plasma Amino Acid Profiles.

Edmund H Wilkes, Erin Emmett, Luisa Beltran, Gary M Woodward, Rachel S Carling

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical chemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Sciences: A Scoping Review.British journal of biomedical science · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Building the Model.Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Supervised machine learning in the mass spectrometry laboratory: A tutorial.Journal of mass spectrometry and advances in the clinical lab · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Edmund H WilkesDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, North West London Pathology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, Hammersmith, London, UK.
Erin EmmettBiochemical Sciences, Viapath, Guys & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Luisa BeltranBiochemical Sciences, Viapath, Guys & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Gary M WoodwardSchool of Life and Medical Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Rachel S CarlingBiochemical Sciences, Viapath, Guys & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPlasma amino acid (PAA) profiles are used in routine clinical practice for the diagnosis and monitoring of inherited disorders of amino acid metabolism, organic acidemias, and urea cycle defects. Interpretation of PAA profiles is complex and requires substantial training and expertise to perform. Given previous demonstrations of the ability of machine learning (ML) algorithms to interpret complex clinical biochemistry data, we sought to determine if ML-derived classifiers could interpret PAA profiles with high predictive performance.

methodsWe collected PAA profiling data routinely performed within a clinical biochemistry laboratory (2084 profiles) and developed decision support classifiers with several ML algorithms. We tested the generalization performance of each classifier using a nested cross-validation (CV) procedure and examined the effect of various subsampling, feature selection, and ensemble learning strategies.

resultsThe classifiers demonstrated excellent predictive performance, with the 3 ML algorithms tested producing comparable results. The best-performing ensemble binary classifier achieved a mean precision-recall (PR) AUC of 0.957 (95% CI 0.952, 0.962) and the best-performing ensemble multiclass classifier achieved a mean F4 score of 0.788 (0.773, 0.803).

conclusionsThis work builds upon previous demonstrations of the utility of ML-derived decision support tools in clinical biochemistry laboratories. Our findings suggest that, pending additional validation studies, such tools could potentially be used in routine clinical practice to streamline and aid the interpretation of PAA profiles. This would be particularly useful in laboratories with limited resources and large workloads. We provide the necessary code for other laboratories to develop their own decision support tools.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAmino AcidsDatabases, ChemicalHumansAmino Acidsinherited metabolic diseaseMachine learningplasma amino acids

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.