Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32870583›Full record

Trial reportHuman brain mapping2020

Central encoding of the strength of intranasal chemosensory trigeminal stimuli in a human experimental pain setting.

Jörn Lötsch, Bruno G Oertel, Lisa Felden, Ulrike Nöth, Ralf Deichmann, Thomas Hummel, Carmen Walter

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human brain mapping, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Brain stimulation targets for chronic pain: Insights from meta-analysis, functional connectivity and literature review.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jörn LötschInstitute of Clinical Pharmacology, Goethe - University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5818-6958
Bruno G OertelInstitute of Clinical Pharmacology, Goethe - University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Lisa FeldenInstitute of Clinical Pharmacology, Goethe - University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Ulrike NöthBrain Imaging Center, Goethe - University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Ralf DeichmannBrain Imaging Center, Goethe - University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Thomas HummelSmell & Taste Clinic, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Carmen WalterInstitute of Clinical Pharmacology, Goethe - University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Goethe University Frankfurt · DETechnische Universität Dresden · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG Lo 612/11-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An important measure in pain research is the intensity of nociceptive stimuli and their cortical representation. However, there is evidence of different cerebral representations of nociceptive stimuli, including the fact that cortical areas recruited during processing of intranasal nociceptive chemical stimuli included those outside the traditional trigeminal areas. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the major cerebral representations of stimulus intensity associated with intranasal chemical trigeminal stimulation. Trigeminal stimulation was achieved with carbon dioxide presented to the nasal mucosa. Using a single-blinded, randomized crossover design, 24 subjects received nociceptive stimuli with two different stimulation paradigms, depending on the just noticeable differences in the stimulus strengths applied. Stimulus-related brain activations were recorded using functional magnetic resonance imaging with event-related design. Brain activations increased significantly with increasing stimulus intensity, with the largest cluster at the right Rolandic operculum and a global maximum in a smaller cluster at the left lower frontal orbital lobe. Region of interest analyses additionally supported an activation pattern correlated with the stimulus intensity at the piriform cortex as an area of special interest with the trigeminal input. The results support the piriform cortex, in addition to the secondary somatosensory cortex, as a major area of interest for stimulus strength-related brain activation in pain models using trigeminal stimuli. This makes both areas a primary objective to be observed in human experimental pain settings where trigeminal input is used to study effects of analgesics.

Indexed as

Brain MappingAdultCarbon DioxideCerebral CortexCross-Over StudiesFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNasal MucosaNociceptionPiriform CortexSingle-Blind MethodSomatosensory CortexTrigeminal NerveYoung AdultCarbon Dioxidedata scienceexperimental human pain modelsfunctional imagingtrigeminal pain

Identifiers

PMID32870583
PMCPMC7670645
OpenAlexW3081646475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.