Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32870490›Full record

ArticleThe patient2020

Using Mind Mapping in Family Meetings to Support Shared Decision Making with Pediatric and Geriatric Patients.

Matthew L Russell, Anne H Carr, Kathleen Kieran

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The patient, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew L RussellMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Anne H CarrHebrew Senior Life, Boston, MA, USA.
Kathleen KieranDivision of Urology, Seattle Children's Hospital, 4800 Sand Point Way NE, OA.9.220, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA. kathleen.kieran@seattlechildrens.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3180-6707
Hebrew College · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USSeattle Children's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDivergent objectives and narratives among members of a healthcare team may lead to suffering, underscoring the need to align patient care with the patient's self-identified priorities and goals. Shared decision making (SDM) with patients who may not be able to make healthcare decisions for themselves presents a unique challenge to healthcare providers, caregivers, and patients. Children and the elderly are two such groups where substituted decision making is often required. Family meetings, wherein stakeholders in a patient's care are gathered, present opportunities to align expectations and clinical goals. There is a clear need for a technique exploring all facets of the patient's story within the context of the biopsychosocial-spiritual model. We sought to promote narrative equity among stakeholders and maintain patient focus during family meetings. We describe the use of Mind Mapping in the family meeting to meet these objectives.

methodsUsing two clinical scenarios, one involving a geriatric patient and another involving a pediatric patient, we describe the stepwise development of Mind Maps and how their use informed discussions among stakeholders in the family meeting.

resultsStakeholders found the Mind Maps easy to draw and helpful in eliciting their own priorities and preferences. Group exploration and refinement of the Mind Maps helped stakeholders to appreciate others' sometimes divergent perspectives, to ensure that the patient's voice was heard, and to ensure that care decisions were patient focused. DISCUSSION: Mind Mapping was easily performed in two clinical scenarios, allowing the patient, family, and medical team to explore the biopsychosocial-spiritual model extensively, to appreciate each stakeholder's priorities, and to identify areas for further development. We have found that Mind Mapping helps define the 'topography' of relationships, prioritizes team discussions, finds shared interests in seemingly divergent objectives, and identifies which team member may best lead a discussion on a particular topic.

conclusionMind Mapping may be a useful tool for family meetings, particularly for geriatric and pediatric patients with multiple stakeholders involved.

Indexed as

Decision MakingDecision Making, SharedAgedCaregiversChildDelivery of Health CareHumansPatients

Identifiers

PMID32870490
OpenAlexW3082817855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.