Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32870365›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2021

Screening for irradiation vasculopathy by intima-media thickness sonography in head and neck cancer patients.

D Strüder, S Hellwig, H Rennau, S van Bonn, S P Schraven, R Mlynski, G Hildebrandt, T Schuldt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

D StrüderDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery "Otto Koerner", Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany. daniel.strueder@med.uni-rostock.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9383-1756
S HellwigDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery "Otto Koerner", Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
H RennauDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Rostock University Medical Centre, Rostock, Germany.
S van BonnDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery "Otto Koerner", Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
S P SchravenDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery "Otto Koerner", Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
R MlynskiDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery "Otto Koerner", Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
G HildebrandtDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Rostock University Medical Centre, Rostock, Germany.
T SchuldtDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery "Otto Koerner", Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.

Funding

Universität Rostock (DE) budgetary resourcesUniversität Rostock (DE) budgetary resources -
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePost-irradiation vasculopathy is a severe form of atherosclerosis and affects the prognosis of head and neck cancer survivors. Sonographic intima-media thickness (IMT) precedes stenosis, plaque formation, and cerebrovascular events. Therefore, IMT may be a valuable screening marker for post-irradiation toxicity. However, the critical irradiation dose and the onset of IMT increase remain unclear.

methodsThe cross-sectional study analysed the carotid artery IMT in 96 irradiated patients and 41 controls regarding irradiation dose, post-irradiation-interval, and cardiovascular risk factors. Distinct irradiation doses to the tumour side and the contralateral hemineck enabled detection of dose depended effects within one patient and control of risk factors.

resultsRadiotherapy caused a dose-dependent increase in IMT. The toxicity did not have saturation effects for > 60 Gy. The IMT increase occurred in short-term following radiotherapy and the risk for a pathological value (> 0.9 mm) rose significantly. The correlation between IMT and radiotherapy was comparable to established cardiovascular risk factors.

conclusionRadiotherapists should consider the additional toxicity of high doses for non-metastatic head and neck cancer. If neck metastases require radiotherapy with boost, IMT measurement is suitable for early detection of carotid artery damage.

Indexed as

Carotid Intima-Media ThicknessHead and Neck NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerHumansRisk FactorsUltrasonographyAtherosclerosisCardiovascular riskRadiotherapyStenosisUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID32870365
PMCPMC8131284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.