Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32870314›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2020

Assessment of a Deep Learning Model to Predict Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With Hepatitis C Cirrhosis.

George N Ioannou, Weijing Tang, Lauren A Beste, Monica A Tincopa, Grace L Su, Tony Van, Elliot B Tapper, Amit G Singal, Ji Zhu, Akbar K Waljee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed
11.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 158 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

George N IoannouDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Healthcare System and University of Washington, Seattle.
Weijing TangDepartment of Statistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Lauren A BesteDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Healthcare System and University of Washington, Seattle.
Monica A TincopaMichigan Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ann Arbor.
Grace L SuMichigan Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ann Arbor.
Tony VanMichigan Integrated Center for Health Analytics and Medical Prediction (MiCHAMP), Ann Arbor.
Elliot B TapperMichigan Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ann Arbor.
Amit G SingalDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas.
Ji ZhuDepartment of Statistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Akbar K WaljeeMichigan Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ann Arbor.
VA Center for Clinical Management Research · USAnn Arbor VA Medical Center · USMichigan Medicine · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of Washington · USVA Puget Sound Health Care System · US

Funding

University of Michigan Center for Gastrointestinal ResearchP30DK034933 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI WILEY, JOHN W · 1986 to 2021
$22.5M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK034933
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Deep learning, a family of machine learning models that use artificial neural networks, has achieved great success at predicting outcomes in nonmedical domains. Objective: To examine whether deep learning recurrent neural network (RNN) models that use raw longitudinal data extracted directly from electronic health records outperform conventional regression models in predicting the risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Design, Setting, and Participants: This prognostic study included 48 151 patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related cirrhosis in the national Veterans Health Administration who had at least 3 years of follow-up after the diagnosis of cirrhosis. Patients were identified by having at least 1 positive HCV RNA test between January 1, 2000, to January 1, 2016, and were followed up from the diagnosis of cirrhosis to January 1, 2019, for the development of incident HCC. A total of 3 models predicting HCC during a 3-year period were developed and compared, as follows: (1) logistic regression (LR) with cross-sectional inputs (cross-sectional LR); (2) LR with longitudinal inputs (longitudinal LR); and (3) RNN with longitudinal inputs. Data analysis was conducted from April 2018 to August 2020. Exposures: Development of HCC. Main Outcomes and Measures: Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, area under the precision-recall curve, and Brier score. Results: During a mean (SD) follow-up of 11.6 (5.0) years, 10 741 of 48 151 patients (22.3%) developed HCC (annual incidence, 3.1%), and a total of 52 983 samples (51 948 [98.0%] from men) were collected. Patients who developed HCC within 3 years were older than patients who did not (mean [SD] age, 58.2 [6.6] years vs 56.9 [6.9] years). RNN models had superior mean (SD) area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.759 [0.009]) and mean (SD) Brier score (0.136 [0.003]) than cross-sectional LR (0.689 [0.009] and 0.149 [0.003], respectively) and longitudinal LR (0.682 [0.007] and 0.150 [0.003], respectively) models. Using the RNN model, the samples with the mean (SD) highest 51% (1.5%) of HCC risk, in which 80% of all HCCs occurred, or the mean (SD) highest 66% (1.2%) of HCC risk, in which 90% of all HCCs occurred, could potentially be targeted. Among samples from patients who achieved sustained virologic response, the performance of the RNN models was even better (mean [SD] area under receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.806 [0.025]; mean [SD] Brier score, 0.117 [0.007]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, deep learning RNN models outperformed conventional LR models, suggesting that RNN models could be used to identify patients with HCV-related cirrhosis with a high risk of developing HCC for risk-based HCC outreach and surveillance strategies.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularHepatitis C, ChronicLiver CirrhosisLiver NeoplasmsArea Under CurveChronic Disease IndicatorsDeep LearningElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerPrognosisRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID32870314
PMCPMC7489819
OpenAlexW3082662855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.