ArticleJournal of animal science2020
Comparative effects of two multispecies direct-fed microbial products on energy status, nutrient digestibility, and ruminal fermentation, bacterial community, and metabolome of beef steers.
Article in Journal of animal science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of Oral Administration of Goat Rumen-Derived Bacterial Isolates on In Vitro and In Vivo Rumen Fermentation Characteristics.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Probiotics Modulate the Ruminal Microbiome and Metabolite Availability to Enhance Rumen Barrier Function and Growth Performance in Goats Fed a High-Concentrate Diet.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Article
- Effects of Different Net Energy Levels in Low-Protein Diversified Diets on Growth Performance, Nutrient Digestibility, Carcass Characteristics, Meat Quality, and Colonic Microbiota in Finishing Pigs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Understanding the differences in rumen bacteria and their impact on dairy cows' production performance: A review.Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2025Review
- Maternal supplementation of a Bacillus-based direct-fed microbials altered the cow prepartum plasma metabolome and the calf plasma metabolome before and after vaccination.Journal of animal science · 2025Article
- Temporal changes in ruminal microbiota composition and diversity in dairy cows supplemented with aFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Effects of feeding different levels of dietary corn silage on growth performance, rumen fermentation and bacterial community of post-weaning dairy calves.Animal bioscience · 2024Article
- Supplementation with liveTranslational animal science · 2024Article
- Effects of dietary supplementation of a blend ofTranslational animal science · 2024Article
- Multi-breed host rumen epithelium transcriptome and microbiome associations and their relationship with beef cattle feed efficiency.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- CRAMdb: a comprehensive database for composition and roles of microbiome in animals.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- Impact of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product during an intestinal barrier challenge in lactating Holstein cows on ileal microbiota and markers of tissue structure and immunity.Journal of animal science · 2023Article
- Effect of Purple Neem Foliage as a Feed Supplement on Nutrient Apparent Digestibility, Nitrogen Utilization, Rumen Fermentation, Microbial Population, Plasma Antioxidants, Meat Quality and Fatty Acid Profile of Goats.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Effects of a multicomponent microbial feed additive containing prebiotics and probiotics on health, immune status, metabolism, and performance of newly weaned beef steers during a 35-d receiving period.Translational animal science · 2022Article
- Review
- Effects of Multi-Species Direct-Fed Microbial Products on Ruminal Metatranscriptome and Carboxyl-Metabolome of Beef Steers.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Article
- Effects of a blend of mannan and glucan on growth performance, apparent nutrient digestibility, energy status, and whole-blood immune gene expression of beef steers during a 42-d receiving period.Translational animal science · 2021Article
- Performance of direct-fed microbials in beef steers.Journal of animal science · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We examined the effects of two direct-fed microbials (DFM) containing multiple microbial species and their fermentation products on energy status, nutrient digestibility, and ruminal fermentation, bacterial community, and metabolome of beef steers. Nine ruminally cannulated Holstein steers (mean ± SD body weight: 243 ± 12.4 kg) were assigned to three treatments arranged in a triplicated 3 × 3 Latin square design with three 21-d periods. Dietary treatments were 1) control (CON; basal diet), 2) Commence (PROB; basal diet plus 19 g/d of Commence), and 3) RX3 (SYNB; basal diet plus 28 g/d of RX3). Commence and RX3 are both multispecies DFM products. From day 16 to 20 of each period, feed and fecal samples were collected daily to determine the apparent total tract digestibilities of nutrients using indigestible neutral detergent fiber method. On day 21 of each period, blood samples were collected for analysis of plasma glucose and nonesterified fatty acid. Ruminal contents were collected at approximately 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 h after feeding on day 21 for analysis of volatile fatty acids (VFA), lactate, ammonia-N concentrations, bacterial community, and metabolome profile. Total tract digestibilities of nutrients did not differ (P > 0.05) among treatments. Compared with CON, steers fed either supplemental PROB or SYNB had greater (P = 0.04) plasma glucose concentrations. Compared with CON, total ruminal VFA, propionate, isovalerate, and valerate concentrations increased (P ≤ 0.05) or tended to increase (P ≤ 0.10) with either supplemental PROB or SYNB, but were not different (P > 0.05) between PROB and SYNB. Compared with CON, PROB reduced (P ≤ 0.05) the relative abundance of Prevotella 1 and Prevotellaceae UCG-001 but increased (P ≤ 0.05) the relative abundance of Rikenellaceae RC9, Succinivibrionaceae UCG-001, Succiniclasticum, and Ruminococcaceae UCG-002. Supplemental SYNB decreased (P ≤ 0.05) the relative abundance of Prevotella 1 and Prevotellaceae UCG-001 but increased (P ≤ 0.05) the relative abundance of Prevotella 7, Succinivibrio, Succiniclasticum, and Ruminococcaceae UCG-014. Compared with CON, metabolome analysis revealed that some amino acids were increased (P ≤ 0.05) in steers fed PROB. This study demonstrated that, compared with CON, supplementation of either PROB or SYNB altered the ruminal bacterial community and metabolome differently; however, their effects on the ruminal VFA profile and energy status of the steers were not different from each other.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.