Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32870166›Full record

ArticleAnatolian journal of cardiology2020

Risk of cardiovascular events in patients with metabolic syndrome: Results of a population-based prospective cohort study (PURE Turkey).

Aytekin Oğuz, Mustafa Kılıçkap, Sadi Güleç, Yüksel Altuntaş, Kubilay Karşıdağ, Ahmet Temizhan, Burcu Çalık Tümerdem, Miraç Vural Keskinler, Sumathy Rangarajan, Salim Yusuf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anatolian journal of cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Variants ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Aytekin OğuzDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul Medeniyet University; İstanbul-Turkey.
Mustafa KılıçkapDepartment of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University; Ankara-Turkey.
Sadi GüleçDepartment of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University; Ankara-Turkey.
Yüksel AltuntaşClinic of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Faculty of Medicine, University of Health Sciences, İstanbul Şişli Hamidiye Etfal Health Training and Research Hospital; İstanbul-Turkey.
Kubilay KarşıdağDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul University; İstanbul-Turkey.
Ahmet TemizhanClinic of Cardiology, University of Health Science, Ankara City Hospital; Ankara-Turkey.
Burcu Çalık TümerdemDepartment of Health Administration, Marmara University Faculty of Health Sciences; İstanbul-Turkey.
Miraç Vural KeskinlerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul Medeniyet University; İstanbul-Turkey.
Sumathy RangarajanPopulation Health Research Institute, McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences; Hamilton, ON-Canada.
Salim YusufPopulation Health Research Institute, McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences; Hamilton, ON-Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMetabolic syndrome (MetS) includes several cardiovascular (CV) risk factors. This study aimed to assess CV risk of MetS, contribution of its components to the risk, and whether MetS provides additional risk beyond its components.

methodsThe Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) Turkey cohort included 3933 individuals aged between 35 and 70 years, with a median follow-up of 8.9 years. MetS was diagnosed as the presence of any of the following criteria: high blood pressure, high fasting plasma glucose, abdominal obesity, low HDL-cholesterol, or high triglycerides. The primary outcome was the composite of fatal CV events, non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke or heart failure, adjusted for age, sex, smoking, family history of CV diseases, and LDL-cholesterol.

resultsThe primary outcome was more common in the MetS group [178 (9.2%) vs. 70 (3.5%); corresponding incidence rate of 11.3 vs. 4.2 per 1000 person-years; log-rank p<0.001]. Each component was significantly associated with the primary outcome; however, when the components were sequentially included in the model, abdominal obesity and high triglycerides did not provide additional risk on top of the other three components. The hazard ratio for MetS for the primary outcome was 2.12 (95% confidence interval 1.59-2.81, p<0.001), and the discriminative ability (c-statistics) of the models with MetS and the components was similar.

conclusionMetS increases the risk of CV events more than two-fold. High blood pressure, high fasting plasma glucose, and low HDL-cholesterol are the top three components of MetS for CV risk. MetS and its components have a similar discriminative ability for CV events.

Indexed as

Metabolic SyndromeAdultAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionPopulation SurveillanceProspective StudiesRisk FactorsRural PopulationTurkeyUrban Population

Identifiers

PMID32870166
PMCPMC7585972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.