ArticleThe oncologist2020
Biomarkers in Breast Cancer: An Integrated Analysis of Comprehensive Genomic Profiling and PD-L1 Immunohistochemistry Biomarkers in 312 Patients with Breast Cancer.
Article in The oncologist, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Case report of invasive lobular carcinoma with pineal metastasis.Oxford medical case reports · 2026Article
- A Butyrate Metabolism-Related Gene Signature Predicts Prognosis, Immune Landscape, and Immunotherapy Efficacy in Breast Cancer.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Variable Landscape of PD-L1 Expression in Breast Carcinoma as Detected by the DAKO 22C3 Immunohistochemistry Assay.The oncologist · 2023Article
- Development and validation of a prognostic model for HER2-low breast cancer to evaluate neoadjuvant therapy.Gland surgery · 2023Article
- Overview on Current Trends and Emerging Therapies in the Chemotherapy of Patients with Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Breast Cancer.Galen medical journal · 2023Review
- Clinicopathologic and Genomic Landscape of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Brain Metastases.The oncologist · 2022Article
- MYC as a therapeutic target for the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer: preclinical investigations with the novel MYC inhibitor, MYCi975.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2022Article
- microRNA-324-3p suppresses the aggressive ovarian cancer by targetingBioengineered · 2022Article
- Assessment of a cancer genomic profile test for patients with metastatic breast cancer.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Clinicopathologic and Genomic Landscape of Breast Carcinoma Brain Metastases.The oncologist · 2021Article
- Clinicopathologic and genomic characterization of PD-L1-positive uterine cervical carcinoma.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2021Article
- Pan-cancer landscape ofJournal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2021Article
- Clinicopathologic and Genomic Characterization of PD-L1 Positive Urothelial Carcinomas.The oncologist · 2021Article
- The Role of m6A RNA Methylation-Related lncRNAs in the Prognosis and Tumor Immune Microenvironment of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
31 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe examined the current biomarker landscape in breast cancer when programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) testing is integrated with comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP). MATERIAL AND
methodsWe analyzed data from samples of 312 consecutive patients with breast carcinoma tested with both CGP and PD-L1 (SP142) immunohistochemistry (IHC) during routine clinical care. These samples were stratified into hormone receptor positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor negative (HER2-; n = 159), HER2-positive (n = 32), and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cohorts (n = 121).
resultsWe found that in the TNBC cohort, 43% (52/121) were immunocyte PD-L1-positive, and in the HR+/HER2- cohort, 30% (48/159) had PIK3CA companion diagnostics mutations, and hence were potentially eligible for atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel or alpelisib plus fulvestrant, respectively. Of the remaining 212 patients, 10.4% (22/212) had a BRCA1/2 mutation, which, if confirmed by germline testing, would allow olaparib plus talazoparib therapy. Of the remaining 190 patients, 169 (88.9%) were positive for another therapy-associated marker or a marker that would potentially qualify the patient for a clinical trial. In addition, we examined the relationship between immunocyte PD-L1 positivity and different tumor mutation burden (TMB) cutoffs and found that when a TMB cutoff of ≥9 mutations per Mb was applied (cutoff determined based on prior publication), 11.6% (14/121) patients were TMB ≥9 mutations/Mb and of these, TMB ≥9 mutations per Mb, 71.4% (10/14) were also positive for PD-L1 IHC.
conclusionOur integrated PD-L1 and CGP methodology identified 32% of the tested patients as potentially eligible for at least one of the two new Food and Drug Administration approved therapies, atezolizumab or alpelisib, and an additional 61.2% (191/312) had other biomarker-guided potential therapeutic options. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This integrated programmed death-ligand 1 immunohistochemistry and comprehensive genomic profiling methodology identified 32% of the tested patients as eligible for at least one of the two new Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies, atezolizumab or alpelisib, and an additional 61.2% (191/312) had other biomarker-guided potential therapeutic options. These findings suggest new research opportunities to evaluate the predictive utility of other commonly seen PIK3CA mutations in hormone receptor-positive breast cancers and to standardize tumor mutation burden cutoffs to evaluate its potentially predictive role in triple-negative breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.