Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32869930›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2020

Biomarkers in Breast Cancer: An Integrated Analysis of Comprehensive Genomic Profiling and PD-L1 Immunohistochemistry Biomarkers in 312 Patients with Breast Cancer.

Richard S P Huang, Xinyan Li, James Haberberger, Ethan Sokol, Eric Severson, Daniel L Duncan, Amanda Hemmerich, Claire Edgerly, Erik Williams, Julia Elvin and 21 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Clinicopathologic and genomic characterization of PD-L1-positive uterine cervical carcinoma.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2021
    Article
  13. Pan-cancer landscape ofJournal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Richard S P HuangFoundation Medicine, Inc., Morrisville, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8395-5168
Xinyan LiFoundation Medicine, Inc., Morrisville, North Carolina, USA.
James HaberbergerFoundation Medicine, Inc., Morrisville, North Carolina, USA.
Ethan SokolFoundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Eric SeversonFoundation Medicine, Inc., Morrisville, North Carolina, USA.
Daniel L DuncanFoundation Medicine, Inc., Morrisville, North Carolina, USA.
Amanda HemmerichFoundation Medicine, Inc., Morrisville, North Carolina, USA.
Claire EdgerlyFoundation Medicine, Inc., Morrisville, North Carolina, USA.
Erik WilliamsFoundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Julia ElvinFoundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Jo-Anne VergilioFoundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Jonathan Keith KillianFoundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Douglas LinFoundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Matthew HiemenzFoundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Jinpeng XiaoFoundation Medicine, Inc., Morrisville, North Carolina, USA.
Deborah McEwanFoundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Oliver HolmesFoundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Natalie DanzigerFoundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Rachel ErlichFoundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Garrett FramptonFoundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Michael B CohenWake Forest Comprehensive Cancer Center and Department of Pathology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Kimberly McGregorFoundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Prasanth ReddyFoundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Dawn CardeiroFoundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Rachel AnhornFoundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Jeffrey VenstromFoundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Brian AlexanderFoundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Charlotte BrownFoundation Medicine, Inc., Morrisville, North Carolina, USA.
Lajos PusztaiYale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Jeffrey S RossFoundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Shakti H RamkissoonFoundation Medicine, Inc., Morrisville, North Carolina, USA.
Foundation Medicine (United States)Wake Forest University · USYale University · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe examined the current biomarker landscape in breast cancer when programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) testing is integrated with comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP). MATERIAL AND

methodsWe analyzed data from samples of 312 consecutive patients with breast carcinoma tested with both CGP and PD-L1 (SP142) immunohistochemistry (IHC) during routine clinical care. These samples were stratified into hormone receptor positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor negative (HER2-; n = 159), HER2-positive (n = 32), and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cohorts (n = 121).

resultsWe found that in the TNBC cohort, 43% (52/121) were immunocyte PD-L1-positive, and in the HR+/HER2- cohort, 30% (48/159) had PIK3CA companion diagnostics mutations, and hence were potentially eligible for atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel or alpelisib plus fulvestrant, respectively. Of the remaining 212 patients, 10.4% (22/212) had a BRCA1/2 mutation, which, if confirmed by germline testing, would allow olaparib plus talazoparib therapy. Of the remaining 190 patients, 169 (88.9%) were positive for another therapy-associated marker or a marker that would potentially qualify the patient for a clinical trial. In addition, we examined the relationship between immunocyte PD-L1 positivity and different tumor mutation burden (TMB) cutoffs and found that when a TMB cutoff of ≥9 mutations per Mb was applied (cutoff determined based on prior publication), 11.6% (14/121) patients were TMB ≥9 mutations/Mb and of these, TMB ≥9 mutations per Mb, 71.4% (10/14) were also positive for PD-L1 IHC.

conclusionOur integrated PD-L1 and CGP methodology identified 32% of the tested patients as potentially eligible for at least one of the two new Food and Drug Administration approved therapies, atezolizumab or alpelisib, and an additional 61.2% (191/312) had other biomarker-guided potential therapeutic options. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This integrated programmed death-ligand 1 immunohistochemistry and comprehensive genomic profiling methodology identified 32% of the tested patients as eligible for at least one of the two new Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies, atezolizumab or alpelisib, and an additional 61.2% (191/312) had other biomarker-guided potential therapeutic options. These findings suggest new research opportunities to evaluate the predictive utility of other commonly seen PIK3CA mutations in hormone receptor-positive breast cancers and to standardize tumor mutation burden cutoffs to evaluate its potentially predictive role in triple-negative breast cancer.

Indexed as

B7-H1 AntigenTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorGenomicsHumansImmunohistochemistryB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorBiomarkersBreast carcinomaComprehensive genomic profilingPD-L1 immunohistochemistry

Identifiers

PMID32869930
PMCPMC7648336
OpenAlexW3082720565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.