Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32869540›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2020

The impact of orthotopic neobladder vs ileal conduit urinary diversion after cystectomy on the survival outcomes in patients with bladder cancer: A propensity score matched analysis.

Xiaohong Su, Kaihui Wu, Shuo Wang, Wei Su, Chuanyin Li, Bingkun Li, Xiangming Mao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. New Evidence on an Old Question: a Meta-Analysis of Wallace versus Bricker Anastomoses.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. [Urinary diversion in old patients (80+ years)].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiaohong SuDepartment of Urology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3939-0291
Kaihui WuDepartment of Urology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Shuo WangDepartment of Urology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Wei SuDepartment of Urology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Chuanyin LiDepartment of Urology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Bingkun LiDepartment of Urology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiangming MaoDepartment of Urology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhujiang Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBladder cancer (BCa) is the most common urinary malignancy. The standard surgical treatment for patients with muscle-invasive BCa is cystectomy plus urinary diversion. Ileal conduit (IC) or orthotopic neobladder (ON), which have different indications, are the most commonly performed urinary diversions. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We sampled 5480 BCa patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2004 to 2015. Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test was used to assess cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). Univariate and multivariate Cox's proportional hazard model was conducted to evaluate the hazard ratio of cancer-specific mortality and all-cause mortality before and after propensity score matching (PSM).

resultsWe identified 5480 patients who received radical cystectomy (RC) plus IC (n = 5071) or ON (n = 409) with a median follow-up period of 33 months (interquartile range, 13-78 months). Patients in the ON group tended to be male and younger, with a higher percentage of married individuals, early pathological T stage, lymphadenectomy, and non-radiotherapy (all P < .05). After 1:1 PSM, 409 matched pairs were selected. Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that the ON group had better CSS and OS probabilities than the IC group in the overall cohort [hazard ratio (HR): 0.692, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.576-0.831, P < .001; HR: 0.677, 95% CI: 0.579-0.793, P < .001 respectively]. However, subgroup analysis revealed that only patients with pathological T2 stage benefited from ON diversion after PSM in the context of CSS (P = .016) and OS (P <.001).

conclusionsYoung, married, and male patients with early pathological T stage, especially T2 stage, were more suitable to receive RC plus ON surgery, which could improve their probability of survival.

Indexed as

Postoperative CareUrinary DiversionAgedCystectomyFemaleHealth Care SurveysHumansMaleMiddle AgedPropensity ScoreProportional Hazards ModelsSEER ProgramSurvival AnalysisTreatment OutcomeUrinary Bladder Neoplasmsbladder cancerileal conduitorthotopic neobladderradical cystectomySEER

Identifiers

PMID32869540
PMCPMC7571812
OpenAlexW3082778641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.