Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32869532›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2020

Scaling up peer-led community-based differentiated support for adolescents living with HIV: keeping the needs of youth peer supporters in mind to sustain success.

Sarah Bernays, Maureen Tshuma, Nicola Willis, Kudzanayi Mvududu, Adrian Chikeya, Juliet Mufuka, Frances Cowan, Webster Mavhu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Sarah BernaysGlobal Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7628-8408
Maureen TshumaCentre for Sexual Health and HIV/AIDS Research (CeSHHAR), Harare, Zimbabwe.
Nicola WillisAfricaid, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Kudzanayi MvududuCentre for Sexual Health and HIV/AIDS Research (CeSHHAR), Harare, Zimbabwe.
Adrian ChikeyaCentre for Sexual Health and HIV/AIDS Research (CeSHHAR), Harare, Zimbabwe.
Juliet MufukaCentre for Sexual Health and HIV/AIDS Research (CeSHHAR), Harare, Zimbabwe.
Frances CowanCentre for Sexual Health and HIV/AIDS Research (CeSHHAR), Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID 0000-0003-3087-4422
Webster MavhuCentre for Sexual Health and HIV/AIDS Research (CeSHHAR), Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID 0000-0003-1881-4398
Centre for Sexual Health and HIV AIDS Research · ZWLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLow rates of viral suppression among adolescents living with HIV (ALHIV) indicate that more effective support is urgently required at scale. The provision of peer support has generated considerable enthusiasm because it has the potential to ameliorate the complex social and relational challenges which underpin suboptimal adherence. Little is known about the impact on young peer supporters themselves, which is the focus of this paper.

methodsWe present qualitative findings from the Zvandiri trial investigating the impact of a peer support intervention on the viral load for beneficiaries (ALHIV, aged 13 to 19 years) in Zimbabwe. The Zvandiri peer supporters aged 18 to 24 years, known as community adolescent treatment supporters (CATS), are themselves living with HIV. Individual in-depth interviews were conducted in late 2018 with 17 CATS exploring their experiences of delivering peer support and their own support needs. Interviews were analysed iteratively using thematic analysis.

resultsThe CATS reported that being peer supporters improved their own adherence behaviour and contributed to an improved sense of self-worth. The social connections between the CATS were a source of comfort and enabled them to develop skills to manage the challenging aspects of their work. Two substantial challenges were identified. First, their work may reveal their HIV status. Second, managing the emotional labour of this caring work; given how commonly the complexity of the beneficiaries' needs mirrored the circumstances of their own difficult lives. Both challenges were ameliorated by the support the CATS provided to each other and ongoing supervision from the adult mentor. There was variation in whether they felt their roles were appropriately valued through the remuneration they received and within the health system. There was a consensus that their experience meant that they would graduate from being a CATS with transferable skills that could enhance their employability.

conclusionsTheir experiences illustrate the advantages and opportunities of being a CATS. To minimize potential harms, it is vital to ensure that they feel valued in their role, which can be demonstrated by the provision of appropriate remuneration, recognition and respect, and that there is continued investment in ongoing support through ongoing training and mentoring.

Indexed as

Adolescent Health ServicesCommunity Health ServicesMedication AdherencePeer GroupAdolescentAdultAnti-HIV AgentsCounselingFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSocial SupportZimbabweAnti-HIV Agentsadolescentscommunity baseddifferentiated service deliveryhealth systemsHIVpeer support

Identifiers

PMID32869532
PMCPMC7459167
OpenAlexW3082847076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.