Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32869527›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the International AIDS Society2020

"If it is left, it becomes easy for me to get tested": Use of oral self-tests and community health workers to maximize the potential of home-based HIV testing among adolescents in Lesotho.

Alain Amstutz, Mathebe Kopo, Thabo I Lejone, Lefu Khesa, Mpho Kao, Josephine Muhairwe, Tracy R Glass, Niklaus D Labhardt

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alain AmstutzSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1716-993X
Mathebe KopoSolidarMed, Partnerships for Health, Maseru, Lesotho.
Thabo I LejoneSolidarMed, Partnerships for Health, Maseru, Lesotho.
Lefu KhesaSolidarMed, Partnerships for Health, Maseru, Lesotho.
Mpho KaoSolidarMed, Partnerships for Health, Maseru, Lesotho.
Josephine MuhairweSolidarMed, Partnerships for Health, Maseru, Lesotho.
Tracy R GlassSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Niklaus D LabhardtSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3599-1791
Community Health Partnership · USSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute · CH

Funding

Swiss National Science Foundation 323530_177576Swiss National Science Foundation IZ07Z0_160876/1Swiss National Science Foundation PCEFP3_181355
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHome-based HIV testing fails to reach high coverage among adolescents and young adults (AYA), mainly because they are often absent during the day of home-based testing. ADORE (ADolescent ORal tEsting) is a mixed-method nested study among AYA in rural Lesotho, measuring the effect of home-based secondary distribution of oral HIV self-tests (HIVST) on coverage, as well as exploring how AYA perceive this HIV self-testing model.

methodsADORE study was nested in a cluster-randomized trial. In intervention village-clusters, oral HIVST were left for household members who were absent or declined testing during a testing campaign. One present household member was trained on HIVST use. Distributed HIVST were followed up by village health workers (VHW). In control clusters no self-tests were distributed. The quantitative outcome was testing coverage among AYA (age 12 to 24) within 120 days, defined as a confirmed HIV test result or known status, using adjusted random-effects logistic regression on the intention-to-treat population. Qualitatively, we conducted in-depth interviews among both AYA who used and did not use the distributed HIVST.

resultsFrom July 2018 to December 2018, 49 and 57 villages with 1471 and 1620 consenting households and 1236 and 1445 AYA in the control and intervention arm, respectively, were enrolled. On the day of the home-visit, a testing coverage of 37% (461/1236) and 41% (596/1445) in the control and the intervention arm, respectively, were achieved. During the 120 days follow-up period, an additional 23 and 490 AYA in control and intervention clusters, respectively, knew their status. This resulted in a testing coverage of 484/1236 (39%) in the control versus 1086/1445 (75%) in the intervention arm (aOR 8.80 [95% CI 5.81 to 13.32]; p < 0.001). 21 interviews were performed. Personal assistance after the secondary distribution emerged as a key theme and VHWs were generally seen as a trusted cadre.

conclusionsSecondary distribution of HIVST for AYA absent or refusing to test during home-based testing in Lesotho resulted in an absolute 36% increase in coverage. Distribution should, however, go along with clear instructions on the use of the HIVST and a possibility to easily access more personal support.

Indexed as

Community Health WorkersSelf-TestingAdolescentAdultChildFamily CharacteristicsFemaleHIV InfectionsHIV TestingHouse CallsHumansLesothoMaleRural HealthYoung AdultadolescentHIVHIVSTLesothooral self-testsecondary distribution

Identifiers

PMID32869527
PMCPMC7459162
OpenAlexW3082100820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.