Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32869404›Full record

SynthesisHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2020

Renegotiating dimensions of the self: A systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis of the lived experience of self-managing rheumatoid arthritis.

Susie Donnelly, Molly Manning, Hasheem Mannan, Anthony G Wilson, Thilo Kroll

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Renegotiating dimensions of the self: A systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis of the lived experience of self-managing rheumatoid arthritis.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The chronic disease Self-Management Programme: A phenomenological study for empowering vulnerable patients with chronic diseases included in the EFFICHRONIC project.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Susie DonnellyCentre for Interdisciplinary Research Education and Innovation in Health Systems (IRIS), School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-0352-3232
Molly ManningSchool of Allied Health, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-2798-2695
Hasheem MannanDepartment of Social Sciences, School of Liberal Education, FLAME University, Pune, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6209-2586
Anthony G WilsonCentre for Arthritis Research, School of Medicine and Medical Science, Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-4855-3926
Thilo KrollCentre for Interdisciplinary Research Education and Innovation in Health Systems (IRIS), School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-2082-5117

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 204844/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs chronic illnesses, such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), place an increased burden on health-care systems, the ability of individuals to self-manage these diseases is crucial.

objectiveTo identify and synthesize the lived experience of self-management described by adults living with RA.

designA systematic search of five electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO and ASSIA) was undertaken to identify relevant studies. Data were extracted and quality-assessed using CASP guidelines. A meta-synthesis was conducted based on Thomas and Harden's thematic synthesis approach.

resultsThe search identified 8423 publications. After removing duplicates, 6527 records remained of which 32 studies met the inclusion criteria. Quality of studies was moderate to high, yet a considerable lack of reflection on researcher bias was evident. Our analysis identified 28 dimensions of self-management RA across six domains: (a) cognitive-emotional, (b) behavioural, (c) social, (d) environmental, (e) physical and (f) technological. Cognitive-emotional experiences dominated the analysis. Renegotiating 'the self' (self-concept, self-esteem, self-efficacy) was a key focus of self-management among individuals with RA.

conclusionOur findings highlight the focus of 'the self' as a central concern in the self-management of RA. Standardized self-management programmes may primarily focus on disease management and daily functioning. However, we suggest that personal biographies and circumstances should move to the fore of self-management support. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews 2018: CRD42018100450. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Patient and public involvement was not explicit in this review. However, three authors provided a patient perspective on the self-management of arthritis and autoimmune disease.

Indexed as

Arthritis, RheumatoidSelf CareAdultChronic DiseaseDelivery of Health CareHumansQualitative Researchlived experiencemeta-synthesisqualitative evidence synthesisrheumatoid arthritisself-managementsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID32869404
PMCPMC7752197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.