Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32869171›Full record

SynthesisInternational urology and nephrology2021

Exercise interventions improve depression and anxiety in chronic kidney disease patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Thalita Lauanna Ferreira, Heitor Siqueira Ribeiro, Alexandre Lima Araújo Ribeiro, Ana Clara Bonini-Rocha, Joana Marcela Sales Lucena, Poliana Alves de Oliveira, Francisco Rafael S Amorim, Aparecido Pimentel Ferreira, Luiz Alexandre Viana Magno, Wagner Rodrigues Martins

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International urology and nephrology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Thalita Lauanna FerreiraUniversity Center ICESP, QS 05 Rua 300 Lote 01, Águas Claras, Brasília, DF, 71961-540, Brazil. thalitalauanna@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3715-7082
Heitor Siqueira RibeiroUniversity Center ICESP, QS 05 Rua 300 Lote 01, Águas Claras, Brasília, DF, 71961-540, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4019-4490
Alexandre Lima Araújo RibeiroFaculty of Physical Education, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5266-4499
Ana Clara Bonini-RochaDepartment of Physiotherapy, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7606-0980
Joana Marcela Sales LucenaDepartment of Physiotherapy, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4060-942X
Poliana Alves de OliveiraDepartment of Physiotherapy, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9649-6463
Francisco Rafael S AmorimDepartment of Physiotherapy, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1745-4351
Aparecido Pimentel FerreiraUniversity Center ICESP, QS 05 Rua 300 Lote 01, Águas Claras, Brasília, DF, 71961-540, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0069-1206
Luiz Alexandre Viana MagnoFederal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3693-1897
Wagner Rodrigues MartinsFaculty of Physical Education, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0709-7373
Universidade de Brasília · BRNational Water Agency · BRUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BR

Funding

Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa do Distrito Federal 0193.001.558/2017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis systematic review examined the effects of exercise interventions on depression and anxiety in chronic kidney disease patients.

methodsElectronic searches were conducted between August 2019 and February 2020 at PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, EBSCO, Scopus, LILACS, EMBASE, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, and Cochrane Library databases. Original clinical trial studies that examined the effects of exercise on depression and anxiety in chronic kidney disease patients, stages 3-5, were included. A total of eight studies were included in the systematic review after applying the eligibility criteria, and six studies used for the meta-analysis procedures.

resultsThe meta-analysis demonstrated statistical difference on depression in favour to exercise when compared to active control (SMD = - 0.66 [- 1.00, - 0.33], p < 0.0001) and passive control (MD = - 6.95 [- 8.76, - 5.14], p < 0.00001). Same results on anxiety demonstrated statistical difference between exercise and active control (SMD = - 0.78 [- 1.21, - 0.34], p = 0.0004).

conclusionFrom the current limited number and quality of published studies, exercise seems to be more effective than sedentary control and other active control groups for improving depression and anxiety symptoms in chronic kidney disease patients.

Indexed as

Exercise TherapyAnxietyDepressionHumansRenal Insufficiency, ChronicTreatment OutcomeAnxietyChronic kidney diseaseDepressionExerciseMood disorders

Identifiers

PMID32869171
OpenAlexW3082086394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.