Trial reportWorld journal of urology2021
Efficacy and safety of mirabegron versus solifenacin as additional therapy for persistent OAB symptoms after tamsulosin monotherapy in men with probable BPO.
Trial report in World journal of urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vibegron, mirabegron, and other add-on therapies for persistent overactive bladder symptoms in α1-blocker-treated men with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.World journal of urology · 2026Pooled it
- Medical Advancements in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Treatments.Current urology reports · 2024Review
- Updates of Overactive Bladder in Pediatrics.International neurourology journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the efficacy and safety of mirabegron versus solifenacin as add-on for persistent OAB symptoms after tamsulosin monotherapy in men with probable BPO. PATIENTS AND
methodsThis prospective randomized single-blind study was conducted on patients with persistent OAB symptoms after at least 12 weeks of tamsulosin 0.4 mg. The patients were randomized into group A in which mirabegron (50 mg once daily) was added and group B in which solifenacin (5 mg once daily) was added. Before and 12 weeks after addition of either drugs, we assessed the efficacy of the treatment using the OABSS, IPSS, Q max, MVV/mic and PVR.
resultsNinety two men were included in this study (46 patients in each group). All the study parameters were significantly improved after the 12-week treatment period in both groups except mean PVR which showed non-significant change in group A and a significant change in group B despite of being clinically irrelevant with only one case of acute urine retention. Overall, no significant difference has been observed between both groups after 12 weeks of treatment regarding all studied parameters except PVR. The incidence of side effects in group A was 10.9% versus 26.1% in group B. Main side effects included dry mouth in 2.2% and 8.7% and constipation in 2.2% and 6.5% in group A and B, respectively.
conclusionOur results indicate that the addition of either mirabegron or solifenacin to patients with persistent OAB symptoms after tamsulosin monotherapy has significant efficacy in controlling these symptoms. The adequate balance between efficacy and tolerability reported in this study with mirabegron may result in better QOL and overall patient satisfaction if compared with antimuscarinics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.