Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32869150›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2021

Role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to predict postoperative Gleason score upgrading in prostate cancer with Gleason score 3 + 4.

Hwanik Kim, Jung Kwon Kim, Sung Kyu Hong, Chang Wook Jeong, Ja Hyeon Ku, Cheol Kwak

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Prostate Health Index (Asian journal of andrology
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hwanik KimDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 82 Gumi-ro, 173 Beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do, 13620, South Korea.
Jung Kwon KimDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 82 Gumi-ro, 173 Beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do, 13620, South Korea.
Sung Kyu HongDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 82 Gumi-ro, 173 Beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do, 13620, South Korea. skhong@snubh.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8344-6774
Chang Wook JeongDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, South Korea.
Ja Hyeon KuDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, South Korea.
Cheol KwakDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, South Korea.
Seoul National University · KRNew Generation University College · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo evaluate the role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in Gleason score (GS) 3 + 4 prostate cancer (PCa) and evaluate independent factors in mpMRI that can predict GS upgrading, we compared the outcomes of GS upgrading group and GS non-upgrading group. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe analyzed the data of 539 patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) for biopsy GS 3 + 4 PCa from two tertiary referral centers. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine significant predictors of GS upgrading. GS upgrading, the study outcome, was defined as GS ≥ 4 + 3 at definitive pathology at RP specimen.

resultsGS upgrading rate was 35.3% and biochemical recurrence (BCR) rate was 8.0%. GS upgrading group was significantly older (p = 0.015), had significantly higher prebiopsy serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level (p = 0.001) and PSA density (p = 0.003), had a higher number of prostate biopsy (p = 0.026). There were 413 lesions (76.6%) of PI-RADS lesion ≥ 4, 236 (57.1%) for PI-RADS 4 and 177 (42.9%) for PI-RADS 5 lesion. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age (p = 0.045), initial prebiopsy PSA level (p = 0.002) and presence of PI-RADS lesion ≥ 4 (p = 0.044) are independent predictors of GS upgrading.

conclusionMpMRI can predict postoperative Gleason score upgrading in prostate cancer with Gleason score 3 + 4. Especially, presence of clinically significant PI-RADS lesion ≥ 4, the significant predictor of GS upgrading, in preoperative mpMRI needs to be paid attention and can be helpful for patient counseling on prostate cancer treatment.

Indexed as

Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance ImagingAgedHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingPostoperative PeriodPredictive Value of TestsProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesGleason score 3 + 4Gleason score upgradingMultiparametric MRIProstate biopsyProstate cancerRadical prostatectomy

Identifiers

PMID32869150
OpenAlexW3082600393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.