Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32869146›Full record

ReviewJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2020

Why Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Therapy Failed in HCC. Can the New Immunotherapy Be Expected to Be Better?

Mustafa Dikilitas

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Recent therapeutics in hepatocellular carcinoma.American journal of cancer research · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Neoadjuvant Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mustafa DikilitasDepartment of Medical Oncology, Inonu University Liver transplantation İnstitute, Malatya, Turkey. dikilitasmd@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHCC remains a challenging disease with its unique characteristics and aggressive behavior. Although there are some curative-intent treatments such as liver transplantation and surgical resection, they themselves did not cure the patients with relatively high recurrence rates. Several modalities including local ablation methods like TACE or TARE, systemic treatments such as chemotherapy, tyrosine kinase inhibitors or antiviral therapies are tested in adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting, but none of them offered a survival benefit (except antiviral therapy in HBV-related HCC).

conclusionAfter a decade of plateau in drug development, ICPIs came into podium with their different mechanism of action consistent with immunogenic nature of the disease and with high expectations, and ongoing trials will show if these agents can satisfy unmet demand in this area.

Indexed as

Ablation TechniquesCarcinoma, HepatocellularChemoembolization, TherapeuticChemotherapy, AdjuvantDisease-Free SurvivalDrug DevelopmentHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunotherapyLiver NeoplasmsNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProtein Kinase InhibitorsRadiotherapy, AdjuvantTime FactorsTreatment FailureImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsProtein Kinase InhibitorsAdjuvantImmunotherapyNeoadjuvant

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.