Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32868882›Full record

ArticleJournal of human hypertension2021

Prevalence and clinical profile of refractory hypertension in a large cohort of patients with resistant hypertension.

Bernardo Chedier, Arthur Fernandes Cortez, Christian Nejm Roderjan, Aline de Hollanda Cavalcanti, Fernanda Oliveira de Carvalho Carlos, Bruno Dussoni Moreira Dos Santos, Elizabeth Silaid Muxfeldt

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bernardo Chedier *Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Arthur Fernandes CortezDepartment of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2873-1601
Christian Nejm RoderjanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4526-7078
Aline de Hollanda CavalcantiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Fernanda Oliveira de Carvalho CarlosDepartment of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Bruno Dussoni Moreira Dos SantosDepartment of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Elizabeth Silaid Muxfeldt *Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. bethmux@globo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3853-7842

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Refractory hypertension (RfHT) is an extreme phenotype of resistant hypertension (RHT) and is considered uncontrolled blood pressure (BP) despite the use of five or more antihypertensives. The objective of this study was to characterize the prevalence and clinical profile of RfHT patients in a historical cohort of patients with RHT at two different times: before and after the introduction of spironolactone. First, this cross-sectional study evaluated 1048 RHT patients (72.3% females, mean [SD] age: 61.2 [11.3] years) referred to a hypertension clinic (prespironolactone period). All patients were submitted to a standard protocol including clinical and complementary exams. Second, the analysis evaluated patients after the introduction of spironolactone (postspironolactone period). Statistical analysis included bivariate comparisons between patients with RHT and patients with RfHT and logistic regressions to assess the independent correlations of RfHT. A total of 146 patients (13.9%) remained refractory despite the use of at least five antihypertensives (prespironolactone period). After the introduction of spironolactone, the prevalence increased to 17.6%. For any criterion, RfHT patients were younger and more obese. In the initial period, current smoking and left ventricular hypertrophy were independently correlated with RfHT. Furthermore, after spironolactone use, RfHT patients had lower aortic stiffness and peripheral artery disease (PAD), pointing to a lower cardiovascular risk despite the lack of BP control. Younger age and lower prevalence of PAD correlated independently with RfHT. In conclusion, there was a high prevalence of RfHT, especially in younger and obese patients, and spironolactone use seemed to reduce cardiovascular risk despite the lack of BP control.

Indexed as

HypertensionAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceSpironolactoneAntihypertensive AgentsSpironolactone

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.