Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32868525›Full record

Trial reportThe American journal of surgical pathology2020

Optimal Criteria for G3 (Poorly Differentiated) Stage II Colon Cancer: Prospective Validation in a Randomized Controlled Study (SACURA Trial).

Hideki Ueno, Megumi Ishiguro, Eiji Nakatani, Toshiaki Ishikawa, Hiroyuki Uetake, Shigeyuki Matsui, Satoshi Teramukai, Kenta Murotani, Yoichi Ajioka, Hideyuki Shimazaki and 9 more

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The American journal of surgical pathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Hideki UenoDepartments of Surgery.
Megumi IshiguroDepartments of Translational Oncology.
Eiji NakataniDivision of Statistical Analysis of Research Support Center, Shizuoka General Hospital, Shizuoka.
Toshiaki IshikawaSpecialized Surgeries, Tokyo Medical and Dental University.
Hiroyuki UetakeSpecialized Surgeries, Tokyo Medical and Dental University.
Shigeyuki MatsuiDepartment of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, Aichi.
Satoshi TeramukaiDepartment of Biostatistics, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto.
Kenta MurotaniBiostatistics Center, Kurume University, Graduate School of Medicine.
Yoichi AjiokaDivision of Molecular and Diagnostic Pathology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata.
Hideyuki ShimazakiPathology, National Defense Medical College, Saitama.
Atsuyuki MaedaDepartment of Surgery, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, Gifu.
Kunio TakumaDepartment of Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Tama Medical Center.
Takefumi YoshidaDepartment of Surgery, Social Insurance Tagawa Hospital, Fukuoka.
Takeshi KambaraDepartment of Surgery, Chugoku Central Hospital, Hiroshima.
Keiji MatsudaDepartment of Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo.
Akinori TakaganeDepartment of Surgery, Hakodate Goryokaku Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan.
Naohiro TomitaDepartment of Surgery, Division of Lower GI Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo.
Kenichi SugiharaTokyo Medical and Dental University.
SACURA Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Grade 3 (G3, poorly differentiated) is an important treatment-decision factor in stage II colon cancer, but no unified diagnostic criteria are established. According to previous studies, an intratumoural poorly differentiated area with no glandular formation (POR) that fills the microscopic field of a ×40 objective lens was an essential factor that defined G3. We aimed to prospectively validate this in a randomized controlled study of adjuvant chemotherapy (SACURA trial). We enrolled 991 patients with stage II colon cancer. POR was graded according to the ×40 objective lens rule and the intensity of poorly differentiated clusters (Grade), and its prognostic power was compared with that of the conventional tumor grade on the basis of predominant histology rule (Grade). According to Grade, 313, 526, and 152 tumors were classified as G1, G2, and G3, respectively, and the 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rates were 91.1%, 82.9%, and 74.7%, respectively (P<0.0001). When G3 and G3 were alternatively added to the prognostic model consisting of 8 conventional factors, only G3 was a significant factor for RFS (P=0.040, Wald test). The adverse impact of G3 on RFS was greater in the microsatellite stable/microsatellite instability-low subset than that in the full analysis set. In the microsatellite stable/microsatellite instability-low subset, the 5-year RFS rate of patients with G3 tumors in the chemotherapy group achieved greater improvement (9.1%) than the surgery-alone group. The least differentiation policy with the ×40 objective lens rule may be highlighted as the diagnostic criterion for G3 because of its validated prognostic value.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationAdenocarcinomaAgedChemotherapy, AdjuvantColectomyColonic NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansJapanMaleMicrosatellite InstabilityMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm Staging

Identifiers

PMID32868525
PMCPMC7690643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.